SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Lind L)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Lind L) > Comparison of a nov...

Comparison of a novel porous titanium construct (Regenerex®) to a well proven porous coated tibial surface in cementless total knee arthroplasty — A prospective randomized RSA study with two-year follow-up

Winther, Nikolaj S. (författare)
Copenhagen University Hospital
Jensen, Claus L. (författare)
Copenhagen University Hospital
Jensen, Claus M. (författare)
Gentofte Hospital
visa fler...
Lind, Thomas (författare)
Gentofte Hospital
Schrøder, Henrik M. (författare)
Copenhagen University Hospital
Flivik, Gunnar (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Ortopedi, Lund,Sektion III,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Orthopaedics (Lund),Section III,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine,Skåne University Hospital
Petersen, Michael M. (författare)
Copenhagen University Hospital
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2016
2016
Engelska 10 s.
Ingår i: Knee. - : Elsevier BV. - 0968-0160. ; 23:6, s. 1002-1011
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background Regenerex is a novel porous titanium construct with a three-dimensional porous structure and biomechanical characteristics close to that of normal trabecular bone. The aim of this study was to compare this novel construct to a well-proven porous plasma sprayed tibial (PPS) implant after total knee arthroplasty. Methods Sixty-one patients scheduled for an uncemented TKA were randomized to receive either a novel highly porous titanium construct Regenerex or the PPS tibial component. Radiostereometric analysis of the tibial components was performed postoperatively and at three, six, 12, and 24 months with measurements of migration (segment motion and maximum total point motion (MTPM)). Results Knee and function scores improved significantly from preoperatively to two-year follow-up. For both the Regenerex and the PPS the majority of migration appeared during the first three months and then stabilized. No statistically significant differences in MTPM were found in any follow-up between three and 24 months. The Regenerex group had a lower migration rate between 12 and 24 months compared with the PPS implants (p = 0.03) but the PPS group had an initial significantly lower subsidence (p = 0.04). Conclusion In conclusion the Regenerex implant could prove an effective scaffold material for coating of uncemented implants but did no better than the PPS component at 24 months of follow-up. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01936415.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Ortopedi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Orthopaedics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Radiostereometric study
Randomized clinical trial
Regenerex
Total knee arthroplasty
Trabecular metal

Publikations- och innehållstyp

art (ämneskategori)
ref (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Knee (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy