Search: L773:2169 897X OR L773:2169 8996 OR L773:0148 0227 OR L773:2156 2202
> (2000-2004) >
On different approa...
-
Thottappillil, Rajeev,1958-Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
(author)
On different approaches to calculating lightning electric fields
- Article/chapterEnglish2001
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:kth-238766
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-238766URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900150DOI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
Three different approaches to the computation of lightning electric fields are compared. These approaches are the traditional dipole (Lorentz condition) technique and two versions of the monopole (continuity equation) technique. The latter two techniques are based on two different formulations of the continuity equation, one used by Thottappillil et al. [1997] and the other by Thomson [1999], the difference between the formulations being related to different treatments of retardation effects. The three approaches involve the same expression for the vector potential but different expressions for the scalar potential. It is analytically shown that the three different expressions for the scalar potential are equivalent and satisfy the Lorentz condition. Further, the three approaches yield the same total fields and the same Poynting vectors. However, expressions in the three approaches for the individual electric field components in the time domain, traditionally identified by their distance dependence as electrostatic, induction, and radiation terms, are different, suggesting that explicit distance dependence is not an adequate identifier. It is shown that the so identified individual field components in the electric field equation in terms of charge density derived by Thottappillil et al. [1997] are equivalent to the corresponding field components in the traditional equation for electric field in terms of current based on the dipole technique. However, the individual field components in the electric field equation based on Thomson’s [1999] approach are not equivalent to their counterparts in the traditional dipole technique equation. Further, in Thottappillil et al.’s [1997] technique and in the traditional dipole technique, the gradient of scalar potential contributes to all three electric field components, while in Thomson’s [1999] technique it contributes only to the electrostatic and induction components. Calculations of electric fields at different distances from the lightning channel show that the differences between the corresponding field components identified by their distance dependence in different techniques are considerable at close ranges but become negligible at far ranges.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Rakov, Vladimir A.University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
(author)
-
Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Journal of Geophysical Research - Atmospheres106:D13, s. 14191-142052169-897X2169-8996
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database