SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Gomes Rui)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Gomes Rui) > (2019) > Exploring Prosocial...

Exploring Prosociality in Human-Robot Teams

Correia, Filipa (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mascarenhas, Samuel F. (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
Gomes, Samuel (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
visa fler...
Arriaga, Patricia (författare)
CIS IUL, Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Lisbon, Portugal.
Leite, Iolanda (författare)
KTH,Robotik, perception och lärande, RPL
Prada, Rui (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
Melo, Francisco S. (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
Paiva, Ana (författare)
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal.
visa färre...
Univ Lisbon, INESC ID, Inst Super Tecn, Lisbon, Portugal CIS IUL, Inst Univ Lisboa ISCTE IUL, Lisbon, Portugal. (creator_code:org_t)
IEEE, 2019
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: HRI '19. - : IEEE. - 9781538685556 ; , s. 143-151
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This paper explores the role of prosocial behaviour when people team up with robots in a collaborative game that presents a social dilemma similar to a public goods game. An experiment was conducted with the proposed game in which each participant joined a team with a prosocial robot and a selfish robot. During 5 rounds of the game, each player chooses between contributing to the team goal (cooperate) or contributing to his individual goal (defect). The prosociality level of the robots only affects their strategies to play the game, as one always cooperates and the other always defects. We conducted a user study at the office of a large corporation with 70 participants where we manipulated the game result (winning or losing) in a between-subjects design. Results revealed two important considerations: (1) the prosocial robot was rated more positively in terms of its social attributes than the selfish robot, regardless of the game result; (2) the perception of competence, the responsibility attribution (blame/credit), and the preference for a future partner revealed significant differences only in the losing condition. These results yield important concerns for the creation of robotic partners, the understanding of group dynamics and, from a more general perspective, the promotion of a prosocial society.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Elektroteknik och elektronik -- Robotteknik och automation (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering -- Robotics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Groups
Social Dilemma
Public Goods Game
Prosocial
Selfish

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kon (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • HRI '19 (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy