SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Visser Linda)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Visser Linda) > Industry Derived Oc...

  • Schenk, Linda,1980-Karolinska Institutet,KTH,Filosofi,Integrative Toxicology, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden (författare)

Industry Derived Occupational Exposure Limits : A Survey of Professionals on the Dutch System of Exposure Guidelines

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2019

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2019-08-24
  • Oxford University Press,2019
  • printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:kth-266728
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-266728URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxz069DOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:142676606URI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • QC 20200117
  • The Netherlands' system for occupational exposure limits (OELs) encompasses two kinds of OELs: public and private. Public OELs are set by the government. Private OELs are derived by industry and cover all substances without a public OEL. In parallel, the regulation concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) has introduced an exposure guidance value similar to the OEL, namely the Derived No-Effect Level (DNEL) for workers' inhalation exposure. This study aimed to investigate issues encountered by occupational health professionals regarding private OELs, and how they perceive the DNELs for workers in relation to private OELs. Towards this aim, we sent out a web-based questionnaire to the members of the Dutch professional organization for occupational hygienists (Nederlandse Vereniging voor Arbeidshygiene [NVVA], n = 513) and to members of the Dutch professional organization for safety engineers (NVVK, n = 2916). Response rates were 27% (n = 139) and 7% (n = 198), respectively. More occupational hygienists (59%) than safety engineers (17%) reported to derive private OELs themselves. Our respondents reported several challenges with the derivation of private OELs. Fifty-one percent of the occupational hygienists and 20% of the safety engineers stated to see a role of REACH Registrants' worker DNELs as private OELs. However, more than half of our respondents were undecided or unfamiliar with worker DNELs. In addition, stated opinions on where worker DNELs fit in the hierarchy of private OELs varied considerably. To conclude, both these professional groups derive private OELs and stated that they need more guidance for this. Furthermore, there is a lack of clarity whether worker DNELs may qualify as private OELs, and where they would fit in the hierarchy of private OELs.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Visser, Maaike J.Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Safety Subst & Prod, Bilthoven, Netherlands. (författare)
  • Palmen, Nicole G. M.Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Ctr Safety Subst & Prod, Bilthoven, Netherlands. (författare)
  • KTHFilosofi (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Annals of Work Exposures and Health: Oxford University Press63:9, s. 1004-10122398-73082398-7316

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy