SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Juth Niklas)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Juth Niklas) > Who should be teste...

Who should be tested in a pandemic? : Ethical considerations

Hansson, Sven Ove (författare)
KTH,Filosofi,Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.;KTH Royal Inst Technol, Div Philosophy, Teknikringen 76, S-10044 Stockholm, Sweden.
Helgesson, Gert (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
Juth, Niklas (författare)
Karolinska Institutet
 (creator_code:org_t)
2021-06-22
2021
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Medical Ethics. - : Springer Nature. - 1472-6939. ; 22:1
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background In the initial phase of the Covid-19 pandemic, difficult decisions had to be made on the allocation of testing resources. Similar situations can arise in future pandemics. Therefore, careful consideration of who should be tested is an important part of pandemic preparedness. We focus on four ethical aspects of that problem: how to prioritize scarce testing resources, the regulation of commercial direct-to-consumer test services, testing of unauthorized immigrants, and obligatory testing. Main text The distribution of scarce resources for testing: We emphasize the use of needs-based criteria, but also acknowledge the importance of choosing a testing strategy that contributes efficiently to stopping the overall spread of the disease. Commercial direct-to-consumer test services: Except in cases of acute scarcity, such services will in practice have to be allowed. We propose that they should be subject to regulation that ensures test quality and adequate information to users. Testing of unauthorized immigrants, their children and other people with unclear legal status: Like everyone else, these individuals may be in need of testing, and it is in society's interest to reach them with testing in order to stop the spread of the disease. A society that offers comprehensive medical services to unauthorized immigrants is in a much better position to reach them in a pandemic than a society that previously excluded them from healthcare. Obligatory testing: While there are often strong reasons for universal testing in residential areas or on workplaces, there are in most cases better ways to achieve testing coverage than to make testing mandatory. Conclusion In summary, we propose (1) decision-making primarily based on needs-based criteria, (2) strict regulation but not prohibition of direct-to-consumer test services, (3) test services offered to unauthorized immigrants, preferably as part of comprehensive medical services, and (4) broad outreach of testing services whenever possible, but in general not obligatory testing.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Covid-19
Pandemic
Testing
Priority-setting
Direct-to-consumer tests
Unauthorized immigrants
Obligatory testing

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy