SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Kenter Jasper)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Kenter Jasper) > What does value plu...

What does value pluralism mean in practice? An empirical demonstration from a deliberative valuation

Isacs, Lina (författare)
KTH,Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE)
Kenter, Jasper (författare)
University of York, Department of Environment and Geography, United Kingdom and Ecologos Research and Consultancy, United Kingdom
Wetterstrand, Hanna (författare)
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
visa fler...
Katzeff, Cecilia, Associate professor, 1957- (författare)
KTH,Strategiska hållbarhetsstudier
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Engelska.
  • Annan publikation (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • The increasing calls for value pluralism within research on valuation in environmental decision-making responds to an increasing recognition that conventional approaches to environmental valuation based in neoclassical economics do not account for important aspects of human-nature relations. Few studies have however explored how value plurality actually plays out in practice. In this paper, we draw on Alan Holland’s (2002) essay “Are choices trade-offs?”, which goes to the heart of issues behind valuation and illuminates differences in conceptions of value and rationality between neoclassical and ecological economists. In a quasi-experimental study on values related to marine management in a coastal community in Sweden with local citizens and politicians, we empirically investigate how participants in a deliberative valuation handle different values in their reasoning and choicemaking. The results demonstrate the relevance of value pluralism for policy by showing the prevalence of preference uncertainty, value incommensurability and both inter- and intrapersonal value conflicts. Value conflicts played out as the inability to achieve multiple transcendental values that were aspired to, including conflicts between social and environmental goals. Rather than attempting to commensurate, participants sought to avoid moral conflicts, and showed emotional anguish where these conflicts came to the fore. This evidence thus suggests that choices are not, fundamentally, trade-offs. Incommensurability appeared as felt experience and deliberate positions rather than expressions of irrationality. Legitimately resolving value conflicts thus demands reason-sensitive means for deciding upon which sacrifices are made and for how to represent public opinion in environmental decision-making in a way that reveals the actual moral considerations of people.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Value pluralism
value plurality
deliberative valuation
deliberative democracy
trade-offs
incommensurability
value conflicts
ecological economics
neoclassical environmental economics
abductive interpretive research
Värdepluralism
värdepluralitet
deliberativ värdering
deliberativ demokrati
trade-offs
inkommensurabilitet
värdekonflikter
ekologisk ekonomi
neoklassisk ekonomi
miljöekonomi
abduktion
Miljöstrategisk analys
Environmental Strategic Analysis
Strategier för hållbar utveckling
Strategies for sustainable development
Critical Studies
Kritiska studier
Filosofi
Philosophy

Publikations- och innehållstyp

vet (ämneskategori)
ovr (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy