Sökning: WFRF:(Kenter Jasper) >
What does value plu...
What does value pluralism mean in practice? An empirical demonstration from a deliberative valuation
-
- Isacs, Lina (författare)
- KTH,Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE)
-
- Kenter, Jasper (författare)
- University of York, Department of Environment and Geography, United Kingdom and Ecologos Research and Consultancy, United Kingdom
-
- Wetterstrand, Hanna (författare)
- Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University
-
visa fler...
-
- Katzeff, Cecilia, Associate professor, 1957- (författare)
- KTH,Strategiska hållbarhetsstudier
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Engelska.
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- The increasing calls for value pluralism within research on valuation in environmental decision-making responds to an increasing recognition that conventional approaches to environmental valuation based in neoclassical economics do not account for important aspects of human-nature relations. Few studies have however explored how value plurality actually plays out in practice. In this paper, we draw on Alan Holland’s (2002) essay “Are choices trade-offs?”, which goes to the heart of issues behind valuation and illuminates differences in conceptions of value and rationality between neoclassical and ecological economists. In a quasi-experimental study on values related to marine management in a coastal community in Sweden with local citizens and politicians, we empirically investigate how participants in a deliberative valuation handle different values in their reasoning and choicemaking. The results demonstrate the relevance of value pluralism for policy by showing the prevalence of preference uncertainty, value incommensurability and both inter- and intrapersonal value conflicts. Value conflicts played out as the inability to achieve multiple transcendental values that were aspired to, including conflicts between social and environmental goals. Rather than attempting to commensurate, participants sought to avoid moral conflicts, and showed emotional anguish where these conflicts came to the fore. This evidence thus suggests that choices are not, fundamentally, trade-offs. Incommensurability appeared as felt experience and deliberate positions rather than expressions of irrationality. Legitimately resolving value conflicts thus demands reason-sensitive means for deciding upon which sacrifices are made and for how to represent public opinion in environmental decision-making in a way that reveals the actual moral considerations of people.
Ämnesord
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Ekonomi och näringsliv -- Nationalekonomi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Economics and Business -- Economics (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Value pluralism
- value plurality
- deliberative valuation
- deliberative democracy
- trade-offs
- incommensurability
- value conflicts
- ecological economics
- neoclassical environmental economics
- abductive interpretive research
- Värdepluralism
- värdepluralitet
- deliberativ värdering
- deliberativ demokrati
- trade-offs
- inkommensurabilitet
- värdekonflikter
- ekologisk ekonomi
- neoklassisk ekonomi
- miljöekonomi
- abduktion
- Miljöstrategisk analys
- Environmental Strategic Analysis
- Strategier för hållbar utveckling
- Strategies for sustainable development
- Critical Studies
- Kritiska studier
- Filosofi
- Philosophy
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- vet (ämneskategori)
- ovr (ämneskategori)