SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Wang Chunliang 1980 )
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Wang Chunliang 1980 ) > (2020-2023) > The Liver Tumor Seg...

The Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS)

Bilic, Patrick (författare)
Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Munich, Germany.
Li, Hongwei Bran (författare)
Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Munich, Germany.;Univ Zurich, Dept Quantitat Biomed, Zurich, Switzerland.
Wang, Chunliang, 1980- (författare)
KTH,Medicinsk avbildning
visa fler...
Menze, Bjoern (författare)
Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Munich, Germany.;Univ Zurich, Dept Quantitat Biomed, Zurich, Switzerland.
visa färre...
Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Munich, Germany Tech Univ Munich, Dept Informat, Munich, Germany.;Univ Zurich, Dept Quantitat Biomed, Zurich, Switzerland. (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Medical Image Analysis. - : Elsevier BV. - 1361-8415 .- 1361-8423. ; 84, s. 102680-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in http://medicaldecathlon.com/. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via https://competitions.codalab.org/competitions/17094.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Segmentation
Liver
Liver tumor
Deep learning
Benchmark
CT

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy