Task Difficulty Differentially Affects Two Measures of Processing Load: The Pupil Response During Sentence Processing and Delayed Cued Recall of the Sentences

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Sökning: L773:1092 4388 OR L773:1558 9102 > Task Difficulty Dif...

Zekveld, Adriana ALinköpings universitet,Institutet för handikappvetenskap (IHV),Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande,Filosofiska fakulteten,Vrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands (författare)

Task Difficulty Differentially Affects Two Measures of Processing Load: The Pupil Response During Sentence Processing and Delayed Cued Recall of the Sentences

Artikel/kapitelEngelska2013

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

American Speech-Language-Hearing Association,2013
printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-102989
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-102989URI
https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/12-0058)DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

Språk:engelska
Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

SwePubSwePub

Klassifikation

Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

Funding Agencies|Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research|Veni 451-10-031|
Purpose: In this study, the authors assessed the influence of masking level (29% or 71% sentence perception) and test modality on the processing load during language perception as reflected by the pupil response. In addition, the authors administered a delayed cued stimulus recall test to examine whether processing load affected the encoding of the stimuli in memory. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanMethod: Participants performed speech and text reception threshold tests, during which the pupil response was measured. In the cued recall test, the first half of correctly perceived sentences was presented, and participants were asked to complete the sentences. Reading and listening span tests of working memory capacity were presented as well. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanResults: Regardless of test modality, the pupil response indicated higher processing load in the 29% condition than in the 71% correct condition. Cued recall was better for the 29% condition. less thanbrgreater than less thanbrgreater thanConclusions: The consistent effect of masking level on the pupil response during listening and reading support the validity of the pupil response as a measure of processing load during language perception. The absent relation between pupil response and cued recall may suggest that cued recall is not directly related to processing load, as reflected by the pupil response.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

speech recognition
speech recall
pupil response
processing load
text reception threshold (TRT)
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

Festen, Joost MVrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands (författare)
Kramer, Sophia EVrije University of Amsterdam, Netherlands (författare)
Linköpings universitetInstitutet för handikappvetenskap (IHV) (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

Ingår i:Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association56:4, s. 1156-11651092-43881558-9102

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...: Zekveld, Adriana ...; Festen, Joost M; Kramer, Sophia E

Artiklar i publikationen: Journal of Speec ...

Av lärosätet: Linköpings universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Sök vidare i:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se