Sökning: WFRF:(Segernäs Kvitting Anna) >
Clinical Utility of...
Clinical Utility of Cognistat in Multiprofessional Team Evalutations of Patients with Cognitive Impairment in Swedish Primary Care
-
- Johansson, Maria (författare)
- Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för neurovetenskap,Hälsouniversitetet,Neurologiska kliniken
-
- Segernäs Kvitting, Anna (författare)
- Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Primärvården i centrala länsdelen
-
- Wressle, Ewa (författare)
- Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för neurovetenskap,Hälsouniversitetet,Geriatriska kliniken
-
visa fler...
-
- Marcusson, Jan (författare)
- Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för neurovetenskap,Hälsouniversitetet,Geriatriska kliniken
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2014
- 2014
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Family Medicine. - : Hindawi Publishing Corporation. - 2090-2042 .- 2090-2050. ; 2014, s. 649253-
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa fler...
-
https://liu.diva-por... (primary) (Raw object)
-
http://downloads.hin...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Background. Diagnostic evaluations of dementia are often performed in primary health care (PHC). Cognitive evaluation requires validated instruments.Objective. To investigate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Cognistat in a primary care population.Methods. Participants were recruited from 4 PHC centres; 52 had cognitive symptoms and 29 were presumed cognitively healthy. Participants were tested using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Clock Drawing Test (CDT), and Cognistat. Clinical diagnoses, based on independent neuropsychological examination and a medical consensus discussion in secondary care, were used as criteria for diagnostic accuracy analyses.Results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.85, 0.79, 0.85, and 0.79, respectively, for Cognistat; 0.59, 0.91, 0.90, and 0.61 for MMSE; 0.26, 0.88, 0.75, and 0.46 for CDT; 0.70, 0.79, 0.82, and 0.65 for MMSE and CDT combined. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 for Cognistat, 0.75 for MMSE, 0.57 for CDT, and 0.74 for MMSE and CDT combined.Conclusions. The diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of Cognistat was better than the other tests alone or combined. Cognistat is well adapted for cognitive evaluations in PHC and can help the general practitioner to decide which patients should be referred to secondary care.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas