SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(de Winter Robbert)
 

Search: WFRF:(de Winter Robbert) > Impact of an invasi...

Impact of an invasive strategy on 5 years outcome in men and women with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes

Alfredsson, Joakim (author)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Kardiologiska kliniken US
Clayton, Tim (author)
London School Hyg and Trop Med, England
Damman, Peter (author)
University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
show more...
Fox, Keith A. A. (author)
Royal Infirm, Scotland
Fredrikson, Mats (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för inflammationsmedicin,Hälsouniversitetet
Lagerqvist, Bo (author)
Uppsala universitet,Kardiologi,Department of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
Wallentin, Lars (author)
Uppsala universitet,Uppsala kliniska forskningscentrum (UCR),Kardiologi,Department of Cardiology, Cardiothoracic Centre, University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
de Winter, Robbert J. (author)
University of Amsterdam, Netherlands
Swahn, Eva (author)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för kardiovaskulär medicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Kardiologiska kliniken US
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2014
2014
English.
In: American Heart Journal. - : Elsevier. - 0002-8703 .- 1097-6744. ; 168:4, s. 522-529
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background A routine invasive (RI) strategy in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS) has been associated with better outcome compared with a selective invasive (SI) strategy in men, but results in women have yielded disparate results. The aim of this study was to assess gender differences in long-term outcome with an SI compared with an RI strategy in NSTE ACS. Methods Individual patient data were obtained from the FRISC II trial, ICTUS trial, and RITA 3 trial for a collaborative meta-analysis. Results Men treated with an RI strategy had significantly lower rate of the primary outcome 5-year cardiovascular (CV) death/myocardial infarction (MI) compared with men treated with an SI strategy (15.6% vs 19.8%, P = .001); risk-adjusted hazards ratio (HR) 0.73 (95% CI 0.63-0.86). In contrast, there was little impact of an RI compared with an SI strategy on the primary outcome among women (16.5% vs 15.1%, P = .324); risk-adjusted HR 1.13 (95% CI 0.89-1.43), interaction P = .01. For the individual components of the primary outcome, a similar pattern was seen with lower rate of MI (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.57-0.83) and CV death (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.56-0.89) in men but without obvious difference in women in MI (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.85-1.50) or CV death (adjusted HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.68-1.39). Conclusions In this meta-analysis comparing an SI and RI strategy, benefit from an RI strategy during long-term follow-up was confirmed in men. Conversely, in women, there was no evidence of benefit.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kardiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems (hsv//eng)

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view