Sökning: WFRF:(Tagesson Sofi) >
Static and dynamic ...
-
Tagesson (Sonesson), SofiLinköpings universitet,Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Ortopedkliniken i Linköping,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten
(författare)
Static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2015
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
2014-09-27
-
Springer Berlin/Heidelberg,2015
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-115936
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-115936URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-014-3279-8DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Funding agencies: Faculty of Health Sciences at Linkoping University; Swedish Center for Research in Sports
-
PURPOSE: To evaluate static and dynamic tibial translation before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. To explore whether static and dynamic tibial translation are correlated.METHODS: Ten patients undergoing quadruple hamstring tendon graft ACL reconstruction were evaluated before, 5 weeks after, and 5 years after ACL reconstruction. Sagittal tibial translation was measured during the Lachman test (static translation) and during gait (dynamic translation) using a CA-4000 electrogoniometer.RESULTS: Five years after ACL reconstruction, static tibial translation did not differ between knees (Lachman test 90 N and 134 N n.s.). In contrast, there was greater maximal anterior tibial translation during gait in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees (5.5 ± 1.4 vs. 4.5 ± 1.6 mm, P = 0.028). There were no differences in static or dynamic tibial translation between the 5-year follow-up and before ACL reconstruction or between the 5-year follow-up and the 5-week follow-up. There were no correlations between static and dynamic tibial translation.CONCLUSION: Although static tibial translation did not differ between knees 5 years after ACL reconstruction, dynamic tibial translation during gait was greater in ACL-reconstructed knees than in uninjured knees. Neither static nor dynamic tibial translation changed 5 years after ACL reconstruction as compared to before surgery and 5 weeks after surgery. Static tibial translation did not correlate with dynamic tibial translation.CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study indicates that although the knee is stable during static measurements, kinematics during gait is impaired 5 years after ACL reconstruction. This may affect the return to sport and risk of osteoarthritis.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, Level IV.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Öberg, BirgittaLinköpings universitet,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten(Swepub:liu)birob80
(författare)
-
Kvist, JoannaLinköpings universitet,Avdelningen för fysioterapi,Medicinska fakulteten(Swepub:liu)joakv97
(författare)
-
Östergötlands Läns LandstingOrtopedkliniken i Linköping
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Springer Berlin/Heidelberg23:12, s. 3691-36970942-20561433-7347
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas