SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Gillies R.)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Gillies R.) > The surgical safety...

The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis

Abbott, T. E. F. (författare)
Queen Mary Univ London, England
Ahmad, T. (författare)
Queen Mary Univ London, England
Phull, M. K. (författare)
Barts Hlth NHS Trust, England
visa fler...
Fowler, A. J. (författare)
Guys and St Thomass NHS Fdn Trust, England
Hewson, R. (författare)
Barts Hlth NHS Trust, England
Biccard, B. M. (författare)
Univ Cape Town, South Africa
Chew, Michelle (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för läkemedelsforskning,Medicinska fakulteten,Region Östergötland, ANOPIVA US
Gillies, M. (författare)
Univ Edinburgh, Scotland
Pearse, R. M. (författare)
Queen Mary Univ London, England
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
ELSEVIER SCI LTD, 2018
2018
Engelska.
Ingår i: British Journal of Anaesthesia. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 0007-0912 .- 1471-6771. ; 120:1, s. 146-155
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. Methods: Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained amp;gt;= 1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32-0.77); Pamp;lt;0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88-1.19); P = 0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62-0.92); Pamp;lt;0.01; I-2 = 87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61-0.88); Pamp;lt;0.01; I-2 = 89%). Conclusions: Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

cohort studies; operative/mortality; postoperative care/methods; postoperative care/statistics and numerical data; surgery; surgical procedures

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy