Democratising planetary boundaries: experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earthsystem governance

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Sökning: WFRF:(Pickering Jonathan) > Democratising plane...

Pickering, JonathanUniv Canberra, Australia (författare)

Democratising planetary boundaries : experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earthsystem governance

Artikel/kapitelEngelska2020

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

Routledge,2020
electronicrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:liu-161164
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-161164URI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661233DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

Språk:engelska
Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

SwePubSwePub

Klassifikation

Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

Funding Agencies|Australian Research CouncilAustralian Research Council [FL140100154]; Swedish Research Council Formas (Formas)Swedish Research Council Formas [211-2012-1842]
Recent debates about the concept of planetary boundaries recall longstanding concerns about whether ecological limits are compatible with ecological democracy. The planetary boundaries framework (originally set out in Rockstrom et al., 2009a, 2009b) defines values for key Earth-system processes such as climate change and biodiversity that aim to maintain a safe distance from thresholds or levels that could endanger human wellbeing. Despite having a significant impact in policy debates, the framework has been criticised as implying an expert-driven approach to governing global environmental risks that lacks democratic legitimacy. Drawing on research on deliberative democracy and the role of science in democratic societies, we argue that planetary boundaries can be interpreted in ways that remain consistent with democratic decision-making. We show how an iterative, dialogical process to formulate planetary boundaries and negotiate planetary targets could form the basis for a democratically legitimate division of labour among experts, citizens and policy-makers in evaluating and responding to Earth-system risks. Crucial to this division of evaluative labour is opening up space for deliberative contestation about the value judgments inherent in collective responses to Earth-system risks, while also safeguarding the ability of experts to issue warnings about what they consider to be unacceptable risks.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Statsvetenskap Statsvetenskap hsv//swe
SOCIAL SCIENCES Political Science Political Science hsv//eng
Planetary boundaries; ecological democracy; deliberative democracy; science-policy interface; Earth system governance; Anthropocene

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

Persson, ÅsaLinköpings universitet,Tema Miljöförändring,Filosofiska fakulteten,Stockholm Environm Inst, Sweden(Swepub:liu)asape34 (författare)
Univ Canberra, AustraliaTema Miljöförändring (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

Ingår i:Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning: Routledge22:1, s. 59-711523-908X1522-7200

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...: Pickering, Jonat ...; Persson, Åsa

Om ämnet

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP: SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...; och Statsvetenskap; och Statsvetenskap

Artiklar i publikationen: Journal of Envir ...

Av lärosätet: Linköpings universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Sök vidare i:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se