SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Santos Diana)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Santos Diana) > Designing and Imple...

Designing and Implementing Deliberative Processes for Health Technology Assessment : A Good Practices Report of a Joint HTAi/ISPOR Task Force

Oortwijn, Wija (författare)
Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Netherlands
Husereau, Don (författare)
Univ Ottawa, Canada
Abelson, Julia (författare)
McMaster Univ, Canada
visa fler...
Barasa, Edwine (författare)
Hlth Econ Res Unit HERU, Kenya
Bayani, Diana Dana (författare)
Natl Univ Singapore, Singapore
Santos, Vania Canuto (författare)
Minist Hlth, Brazil
Culyer, Anthony (författare)
Univ York, England
Facey, Karen (författare)
Evidence Based Health Policy Consultant, Drymen, Scotland
Grainger, David (författare)
Biointelect, Australia
Kieslich, Katharina (författare)
Univ Vienna, Austria
Ollendorf, Daniel (författare)
Tufts Univ, MA, USA
Pichon-Riviere, Andres (författare)
Univ Buenos Aires, Argentina
Sandman, Lars, 1965- (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för samhälle och hälsa,Medicinska fakulteten,National Centre for Priority Setting in Health Care
Strammiello, Valentina (författare)
European Patients Forum, Belgium
Teerawattananon, Yot (författare)
Minist Hlth, Thailand
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press, 2022
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. - Cambridge, United Kingdom : Cambridge University Press. - 0266-4623 .- 1471-6348. ; 38:1, s. 1-16
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives Deliberative processes for health technology assessment (HTA) are intended to facilitate participatory decision making, using discussion and open dialogue between stakeholders. Increasing attention is being given to deliberative processes, but guidance is lacking for those who wish to design or use them. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) and ISPOR-The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research initiated a joint Task Force to address this gap.Methods The joint Task Force consisted of fifteen members with different backgrounds, perspectives, and expertise relevant to the field. It developed guidance and a checklist for deliberative processes for HTA. The guidance builds upon the few, existing initiatives in the field, as well as input from the HTA community following an established consultation plan. In addition, the guidance was subject to two rounds of peer review.Results A deliberative process for HTA consists of procedures, activities, and events that support the informed and critical examination of an issue and the weighing of arguments and evidence to guide a subsequent decision. Guidance and an accompanying checklist are provided for (i) developing the governance and structure of an HTA program and (ii) informing how the various stages of an HTA process might be managed using deliberation.Conclusions The guidance and the checklist contain a series of questions, grouped by six phases of a model deliberative process. They are offered as practical tools for those wishing to establish or improve deliberative processes for HTA that are fit for local contexts. The tools can also be used for independent scrutiny of deliberative processes.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Systemvetenskap, informationssystem och informatik (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Information Systems (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Health technology assessment; Deliberative processes; Guidance; Stakeholders; Participation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy