SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Faulkner Jessica)
 

Search: WFRF:(Faulkner Jessica) > The effectiveness o...

The effectiveness of self-care interventions in chronic illness : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Lee, Christopher S. (author)
Boston Coll, MA USA; Australian Catholic Univ, Australia; Boston Coll, MA 02467 USA
Westland, Heleen (author)
Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Netherlands
Faulkner, Kenneth M. (author)
Boston Coll, MA USA; SUNY Stony Brook, NY USA
show more...
Iovino, Paolo (author)
Australian Catholic Univ, Australia; Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Italy
Thompson, Jessica Harman (author)
Boston Coll, MA USA; Univ Kentucky, KY USA
Sexton, Jessica (author)
Boston Coll, MA USA
Farry, Elizabeth (author)
Unsolicited Advisors, Hopkinton, MA, USA
Jaarsma, Tiny (author)
Linköpings universitet,Avdelningen för omvårdnad och reproduktiv hälsa,Medicinska fakulteten,Australian Catholic Univ, Australia
Riegel, Barbara (author)
Australian Catholic Univ, Australia; Univ Penn, PA USA
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, 2022
2022
English.
In: International Journal of Nursing Studies. - : Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd. - 0020-7489 .- 1873-491X. ; 134
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objective: To characterize and explain variation in the comparative effectiveness of self-care interventions on relevant outcomes of chronic illness compared with controls. Design: Meta-analysis and meta-regression. Methods: Data extraction was framed within the context of a previously-published scoping review of randomized trials designed to enhance self-care in type 2 diabetes mellitus, heart failure, hypertension, asthma, coronary artery disease, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (published between 2008 and 2019). Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Meta-regression was used to test the effect of potential moderators on trial effectiveness. Results: 145 trials involving 36,853 participants were included. Overall, the effect size of self-care interventions on improving outcomes was small (Hedges g = 0.29 (95% CI = 0.25-0.33), p < 0.001) with statistically significant heterogeneity across trials (Q = 514.85, p < 0.001, I2 = 72.0%). A majority of trials (n = 83, 57.2%) were rated as having a high risk of bias. There was no statistically significant difference in trial effectiveness based on the use of theory, specific components of self-care addressed, the number of modes of delivery, the number of behavioral change techniques, specific modes of delivery, specific behavioral change techniques, intervention duration, total number of hours of intervention, or either participant age or gender.Conclusions: Self-care interventions are modestly effective in improving outcomes. Poor trial quality limits the strength of conclusions in this area of science. There is much to be done to enhance the design, conduct and reporting of self-care trials in order to gain more insight into the effectiveness of self-care interventions.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Chronic disease; Heart failure; Hypertension; Asthma; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder; Diabetes mellitus; Type 2; Meta -analysis

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view