SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

L773:0930 2794
 

Sökning: L773:0930 2794 > Surgical education ...

Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES DELPHI-study

Feenstra, Tim M. (författare)
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterol & Metab, Netherlands; Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Netherlands
Tejedor, Patricia (författare)
Univ Hosp Gregorio Maranon, Spain
Popa, Dorin E. (författare)
Linköpings universitet,Institutionen för biomedicinska och kliniska vetenskaper,Medicinska fakulteten,Region Östergötland, Kirurgiska kliniken US
visa fler...
Francis, Nader (författare)
Yeovil Dist Hosp, England; Northwick Pk & St Marks Hosp, England
Schijven, Marlies P. (författare)
Univ Amsterdam, Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterol & Metab, Netherlands; Amsterdam Publ Hlth, Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-11-30
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Surgical Endoscopy. - : SPRINGER. - 0930-2794 .- 1432-2218. ; 37, s. 2719-2728
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BackgroundsTo date, it is unclear what the educational response to the restrictions on minimally invasive surgery imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic have been, and how MIS-surgeons see the post-pandemic future of surgical education. Using a modified Delphi-methodology, this study aims to assess the effects of COVID on MIS-training and to develop a consensus on the educational response to the pandemic. MethodsA three-part Delphi study was performed among the membership of the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES). The first survey aimed to survey participants on the educational response in four educational components: training in the operating room (OR), wet lab and dry lab training, assessment and accreditation, and use of digital resources. The second and third survey aimed to formulate and achieve consensus on statements on, and resources in, response to the pandemic and in post-pandemic MIS surgery. ResultsOver 247 EAES members participated in the three rounds of this Delphi survey. MIS-training decreased by 35.6-55.6%, alternatives were introduced in 14.7-32.2% of respondents, and these alternatives compensated for 32.2-43.2% of missed training. OR-training and assessments were most often affected due to the cancellation of elective cases (80.7%, and 73.8% affected, respectively). Consensus was achieved on 13 statements. Although digital resources were deemed valuable alternatives for OR-training and skills assessments, face-to-face resources were preferred. Videos and hands-on training-wet labs, dry labs, and virtual reality (VR) simulation-were the best appreciated resources. ConclusionsCOVID-19 has severely affected surgical training opportunities for minimally invasive surgery. Face-to-face training remains the preferred training method, although digital and remote training resources are believed to be valuable additions to the training palette. Organizations such as the EAES are encouraged to support surgical educators in implementing these resources. Insights from this Delphi can guide (inter)national governing training bodies and hospitals in shaping surgical resident curricula in post pandemic times.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Kirurgi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Surgery (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Training; COVID-19; Delphi; Consensus; Education; Surgery; Laparoscopy; Laparoscopic surgery

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy