SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Gandhi M)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Gandhi M) > Cost-effectiveness ...

Cost-effectiveness of resuvastatin in comparison with generic atorvastatin and simvastatin in a Swedish population at high risk of cardiovascular events

Gandhi, Sanya K. (författare)
AstraZeneca LP, Wilmington, DE, USA
Jensen, Marie M. (författare)
AstraZeneca, Lund, Sweden
Fox, Kathleen M. (författare)
Strategic HealthCare Solution, Monkton, MD, USA
visa fler...
Smolen, Lee (författare)
Medical Decision Modeling Inc, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Olsson, Anders (författare)
Östergötlands Läns Landsting,Linköpings universitet,Internmedicin,Hälsouniversitetet,Endokrinmedicinska kliniken
Paulsson, Thomas (författare)
AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Dove Medical Press, 2012
2012
Engelska.
Ingår i: ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research. - : Dove Medical Press. - 1178-6981. ; 4, s. 1-11
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: To assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin therapy compared with generic simvastatin and generic atorvastatin in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality in a Swedish population with Framingham risk ≥20%.Methods: A probabilistic Monte Carlo simulation model based on data from JUPITER (the Justification for the Use of statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) was used to estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of rosuvastatin 20 mg daily versus simvastatin or atorvastatin 40 mg for the prevention of cardiovascular death and morbidity. The three-stage model included cardiovascular event prevention simulating the 4 years of JUPITER, initial prevention beyond the trial, and subsequent cardiovascular event prevention. A Swedish health care payer perspective (direct costs only) was modeled for a lifetime horizon, with 2008/2009 as the costing period. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.Results: The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with rosuvastatin 20 mg over simvastatin or atorvastatin 40 mg ranged from SEK88,113 (rosuvastatin 20 mg versus simvastatin 40 mg; Framingham risk ≥30%; net avoidance of 34 events/1000 patients) to SEK497,542 (versus atorvastatin 40 mg: Framingham risk ≥20%; net avoidance of 11 events/1000 patients) over a lifetime horizon. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SEK500,000/QALY, rosuvastatin 20 mg would be cost-effective for approximately 75%–85% of simulations relative to atorvastatin or simvastatin 40 mg. Sensitivity analyses indicated the findings to be robust.Conclusion: Rosuvastatin 20 mg is cost-effective over a lifetime horizon compared with generic simvastatin or atorvastatin 40 mg in patients at high cardiovascular risk in Sweden.

Nyckelord

cardiovascular disease
cost-benefit analysis
cost-effectiveness
rosuvastatin
simvastatin
atorvastatin
generic
high risk

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy