SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Habibipour Abdolrasoul 1979 )
 

Search: WFRF:(Habibipour Abdolrasoul 1979 ) > A Taxonomy of Facto...

  • Habibipour, Abdolrasoul,1979-Luleå tekniska universitet,Datavetenskap (author)

A Taxonomy of Factors Influencing Drop-Out Behaviour in Living Lab Field Tests

  • Article/chapterEnglish2018

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2018-05-29
  • Carleton University,2018
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:ltu-69366
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-69366URI
  • https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1155DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Validerad;2018;Nivå 2;2018-06-12 (andbra)
  • The concept of a “living lab” is a relatively new research area and phenomenon that facilitates user engagement in open innovation activities. Studies on living labs show that the users’ motivation to participate in a field test is higher at the beginning of the project than during the rest of the test, and that participants have a tendency to drop out before completing the assigned tasks. However, the literature still lacks theories describing the phenomenon of drop-out within the area of field tests in general and living lab field tests in particular. As the first step in constructing a theoretical discourse, the aims of this study are to present an empirically derived taxonomy for the various factors that influence drop-out behaviour; to provide a definition of “drop-out” in living lab field tests; and to understand the extent to which each of the identified items influence participant drop-out behaviour. To achieve these aims, we first extracted factors influencing drop-out behaviour in the field test from our previous studies on the topic, and then we validated the extracted results across 14 semi-structured interviews with experts in living lab field tests. Our findings show that identified reasons for dropping out can be grouped into three themes: innovation-related, process-related, and participant-related. Each theme consists of three categories with a total of 44 items. In this study, we also propose a unified definition of “drop-out” in living lab field tests.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Georges, Annabelimec.livinglabs (author)
  • Ståhlbröst, Anna,1967-Luleå tekniska universitet,Datavetenskap(Swepub:ltu)stahlis (author)
  • Schuurman, Dimitriimec.livinglabs (author)
  • Bergvall-Kåreborn, Birgitta,1968-Luleå tekniska universitet,Datavetenskap(Swepub:ltu)biggan (author)
  • Luleå tekniska universitetDatavetenskap (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Technology Innovation Management Review: Carleton University, s. 5-211927-0321

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view