SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Larsson Christel)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Larsson Christel) > Retrospective clini...

Retrospective clinical evaluation of implant‐supported single crowns : mean follow‐up of 15 years

Chrcanovic, Bruno Ramos (författare)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
Kisch, Jenö (författare)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Larsson, Christel (författare)
Malmö universitet,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD),Biofilms Research Center for Biointerfaces
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-05-17
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 30:7
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objective: To retrospectively assess the clinical outcomes of implant‐supported single crowns and the supporting implants. Material and Methods: This retrospective study included all patients treated with implant‐supported single crowns at one specialist clinic. Implant and prosthesis failure, and mechanical/technical complications (ceramic fracture/chipping; crown loss of retention/mobility; crown failure/fracture; loosening/loss/fracture of prosthetic screw; implant failure/fracture) were the outcomes analyzed. Any condition/situation that led to the removal/replacement of crowns was considered prosthesis failure. Results: 438 patients with 567 crowns were included. Mean±SD follow‐up of 183.4±69.3 months. 37 implants (6.5%) and 54 crowns (9.5%) failed. If only technical problems were considered, the crown failure rate decreased to 4.1% (23/567). Most common reasons for crown failure: esthetic issue (n=12), crown constantly mobile (n=9), change to another type of prosthesis together with other implants (n=8), crown fracture (n=7), crown in infraposition in comparison to adjacent teeth (n=7). The odds of crown failure were shown to be statistically significantly higher for the following factors: younger patients, maxillary crowns, and screw‐retained crowns. Loose prosthetic screw was much more prevalent in screw‐retained than in cemented crowns. Ceramic fracture/chipping was more prevalent in screw‐retained crowns, maxillae, females. Crown fracture was more prevalent in ceramic crowns, screw‐retained crowns, maxillae, posterior region, females. However, these differences were statistically significant only for crown fractures in females. Conclusions: The odds of crown failure were significant for some factors, but one must keep in mind that non‐technical complications are as common as technical ones as reasons for the replacement of implant‐supported single crowns.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Dental implant
Fixed prosthesis
Implant-supported single crown
Technical complications
Survival

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Chrcanovic, Brun ...
Kisch, Jenö
Larsson, Christe ...
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Odontologi
Artiklar i publikationen
Clinical Oral Im ...
Av lärosätet
Malmö universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy