SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Berner Simon)
 

Search: WFRF:(Berner Simon) > Nanostructures and ...

Nanostructures and hydrophilicity influence osseointegration : a biomechanical study in the rabbit tibia

Wennerberg, Ann (author)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Jimbo, Ryo (author)
Malmö högskola,Odontologiska fakulteten (OD)
Stuebinger, Stefan (author)
show more...
Obrecht, Marcel (author)
Dard, Michel (author)
Berner, Simon (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2013-06-19
2014
English.
In: Clinical Oral Implants Research. - : Wiley-Blackwell. - 0905-7161 .- 1600-0501. ; 25:9, s. 1041-1050
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • ObjectiveImplant surface properties have long been identified as an important factor to promote osseointegration. The importance of nanostructures and hydrophilicity has recently been discussed. The aim of this study was to investigate how nanostructures and wettability influence osseointegration and to identify whether the wettability, the nanostructure or both in combination play the key role in improved osseointegration. Materials and MethodsTwenty-six adult rabbits each received two Ti grade 4 discs in each tibia. Four different types of surface modifications with different wettability and nanostructures were prepared: hydrophobic without nanostructures (SLA), with nanostructures (SLAnano); hydrophilic with two different nanostructure densities (low density: pmodSLA, high density: SLActive). All four groups were intended to have similar chemistry and microroughness. The surfaces were evaluated with contact angle measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy and interferometry. After 4 and 8weeks healing time, pull-out tests were performed. ResultsSLA and SLAnano were hydrophobic, whereas SLActive and pmodSLA were super-hydrophilic. No nanostructures were present on the SLA surface, but the three other surface modifications clearly showed the presence of nanostructures, although more sparsely distributed on pmodSLA. The hydrophobic samples showed higher carbon contamination levels compared with the hydrophilic samples. After 4weeks healing time, SLActive implants showed the highest pull-out values, with significantly higher pull-out force than SLA and SLAnano. After 8weeks, the SLActive implants had the highest pull-out force, significantly higher than SLAnano and SLA. ConclusionsThe strongest bone response was achieved with a combination of wettability and the presence of nanostructures (SLActive).

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Odontologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Dentistry (hsv//eng)

Keyword

bone healing
hydrophilicity
hydrophobicity
implants
nanostructures

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Wennerberg, Ann
Jimbo, Ryo
Stuebinger, Stef ...
Obrecht, Marcel
Dard, Michel
Berner, Simon
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Dentistry
Articles in the publication
Clinical Oral Im ...
By the university
Malmö University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view