Search: L773:2405 8726
> (2023) >
Responding to the I...
Responding to the Indeterminacy of Doctoral Research in Design
-
- Davis, Meredith (author)
- College of Design, North Carolina State University, USA
-
- Feast, Luke (author)
- Department of Architecture, Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Denmark
-
- Forlizzi, Jodi (author)
- School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, USA
-
show more...
-
- Friedman, Ken (author)
- College of Design and Innovation, Tongji University, China
-
- Ilhan, Ali (author)
- School of Design/College of Design, Art, Architecture and Planning, University of Cincinnati, USA
-
- Ju, Wendy (author)
- Jacobs Technion-Cornell Institute, Cornell Tech, Cornell University, USA
-
- Kortuem, Gerd (author)
- Faculty of Industrial Design Engineering, Delft University of Technology, the Netherlands
-
- Hellström Reimer, Maria, Professor, 1960- (author)
- Malmö universitet,Institutionen för konst, kultur och kommunikation (K3)
-
- Teixeira, Carlos (author)
- Institute of Design, Illinois Institute of Technology, USA
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Elsevier, 2023
- 2023
- English.
-
In: She Ji. - : Elsevier. - 2405-8726. ; 9:2, s. 283-307
- Related links:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show more...
-
https://mau.diva-por... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- The Future of Design Education working group on doctoral education included doctoral supervisors from nine programs around the world and addressed the indeterminacy of standards for the PhD in Design. Internationally, “contributions to knowledge” under the PhD degree title range from evidence-based investigations documented in a dissertation to personal reflections on making artifacts. In some programs, quantitative and qualitative research methods are taught; in others, there is no instruction in methods. The working group suggested that reflection on one’s own creative production is the role of the professional master’s degree and recommended standards for two doctoral programs—the PhD and the Doctor of Design (DDes). The group defined the PhD as addressing unresolved problems with the goal of generalizable knowledge or theory for the field. It described the DDes as a professional practice degree in which research is done in a practice setting to frame a specific opportunity space, guide in-process design decisions, or evaluate outcomes. DDes findings do not claim generalizability and result in “cases.” The working group discussed methods, sampling, standards of evidence and claims, ethics, research writing, and program management.
Subject headings
- HUMANIORA -- Konst -- Design (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Arts -- Design (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- PhD in Design
- Doctor of Design
- Design research
- Doctoral education
- Practice-based research
- Design knowledge
Publication and Content Type
- vet (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
-
She Ji
(Search for host publication in LIBRIS)
To the university's database