SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-43496"
 

Sökning: onr:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mdh-43496" > The social-economic...

The social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanism

Tang, Y. (författare)
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China
Zhang, Q. (författare)
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China
Li, Y. (författare)
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China
visa fler...
Li, Hailong, 1976- (författare)
Mälardalens högskola,Framtidens energi,China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China
Pan, X. (författare)
China University of Petroleum-Beijing, Changping, Beijing, China
Mclellan, B. (författare)
Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Japan
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier Ltd, 2019
2019
Engelska.
Ingår i: Applied Energy. - : Elsevier Ltd. - 0306-2619 .- 1872-9118. ; 251
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • With the increasing popularity of Electric Vehicles (EVs), a large number of EV batteries are intensively reaching their end-of-life, which has posed substantial challenges in ecological protection and sustainable development. However, the traditional subsidy mechanism is not effective in the current recycling market. Moreover, it is not conducive for guiding the EV industry to reduce dependence on the governmental financial support. As the reward-penalty mechanism has been successfully applied in similar fields, such as the recycling of waste portable batteries, it is expected to become a feasible alternative policy to promote the recycling of retired EV batteries. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the social-economic-environmental impacts of recycling retired EV batteries under reward-penalty mechanisms by developing a Stackelberg game theoretical model. Three scenarios are proposed and compared: S1 no policy intervention, S2 subsidy mechanism, and S3 reward-penalty mechanism. The obtained results show that:(i) Compared with the subsidy mechanism, the reward-penalty mechanism presents greater effects on recycling rate and the social welfare; (2) Under the subsidy mechanism, consumer surplus and the profit of EV manufacturer are two main driving factors of the social welfare. Under the reward-penalty mechanism, the reduced environmental burden tends to be another key contribution; (3) A relatively low minimum recycling rate favors the environmental benefit, consumer surplus and profit of EV manufacturer, while a relatively high minimum recycling rate is beneficial to reduce both the policy implementation cost and environmental burden caused by untreated EV batteries.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Maskinteknik -- Energiteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Mechanical Engineering -- Energy Engineering (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Battery recycling
Electric vehicle
Game theoretical model
Retired EV batteries
Reward-penalty mechanism

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Tang, Y.
Zhang, Q.
Li, Y.
Li, Hailong, 197 ...
Pan, X.
Mclellan, B.
Om ämnet
TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER
TEKNIK OCH TEKNO ...
och Maskinteknik
och Energiteknik
Artiklar i publikationen
Applied Energy
Av lärosätet
Mälardalens universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy