Sökning: hsv:(HUMANIORA) hsv:(Filosofi etik och religion) hsv:(Etik) >
The connection betw...
The connection between moral positions and moral arguments drives opinion change
-
- Strimling, Pontus (författare)
- Stockholms universitet,Centrum för evolutionär kulturforskning,Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden; Centre for Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
-
- Vartanova, I. (författare)
- Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Sweden
-
- Jansson, Fredrik (författare)
- Stockholms universitet,Mälardalens högskola,Utbildningsvetenskap och Matematik,Centre for Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden,MAM,Centrum för evolutionär kulturforskning,Mälardalen University, Sweden
-
visa fler...
-
- Eriksson, Kimmo, 1967- (författare)
- Stockholms universitet,Mälardalens högskola,Utbildningsvetenskap och Matematik,Centre for Cultural Evolution, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden,MAM,Centrum för evolutionär kulturforskning,Mälardalen University, Sweden
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2019-07-15
- 2019
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: Nature Human Behaviour. - : NLM (Medline). - 2397-3374. ; 3:9, s. 922-930
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Liberals and conservatives often take opposing positions on moral issues. But what makes a moral position liberal or conservative? Why does public opinion tend to become more liberal over time? And why does public opinion change especially fast on certain issues, such as gay rights? We offer an explanation based on how different positions connect with different kinds of moral arguments. Based on a formal model of opinion dynamics, we predicted that positions better connected to harm and fairness arguments will be more popular among liberals and will become more popular over time among liberals and conservatives. Finally, the speed of this trend will be faster the better the position connects to harm and fairness arguments. These predictions all held with high accuracy in 44 years of polling on moral opinions. The model explains the connection between ideology and moral opinions, and generates precise predictions for future opinion change.
Ämnesord
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Etik (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Ethics (hsv//eng)
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Data- och informationsvetenskap -- Bioinformatik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Computer and Information Sciences -- Bioinformatics (hsv//eng)
- NATURVETENSKAP -- Matematik -- Annan matematik (hsv//swe)
- NATURAL SCIENCES -- Mathematics -- Other Mathematics (hsv//eng)
- SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
- SOCIAL SCIENCES -- Psychology (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Filosofi, etik och religion (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion (hsv//eng)
- HUMANIORA -- Annan humaniora (hsv//swe)
- HUMANITIES -- Other Humanities (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- article
- ideology
- male
- morality
- prediction
- public opinion
- velocity
- Mathematics/Applied Mathematics
- matematik/tillämpad matematik
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas