SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

L773:1178 1653 OR L773:1178 1661
 

Sökning: L773:1178 1653 OR L773:1178 1661 > Maximum Acceptable ...

Maximum Acceptable Risk Estimation Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment and a Probabilistic Threshold Technique

Veldwijk, Jorien (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
Lynn DiSantostefan, Rachael (författare)
Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, USA
Janssen, Ellen (författare)
Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, USA
visa fler...
Simons, Gwenda (författare)
Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Falahee, Marie (författare)
Rheumatology Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Englbrecht, Matthias (författare)
Freelance Healthcare Data Scientist, Greven, Germany
Schölin Bywall, Karin (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Centrum för forsknings- och bioetik
Radawski, Christine (författare)
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Raza, Karim (författare)
Department of Rheumatology, Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK
Hauber, Brett (författare)
Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY, USA
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2023
2023
Engelska.
Ingår i: Patient. - : Springer. - 1178-1653 .- 1178-1661.
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • ObjectiveWe aimed to empirically compare maximum acceptable risk results estimated using both a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and a probabilistic threshold technique (PTT).MethodsMembers of the UK general public (n = 982) completed an online survey including a DCE and a PTT (in random order) measuring their preferences for preventative treatment for rheumatoid arthritis. For the DCE, a Bayesian D-efficient design consisting of four blocks of 15 choice tasks was constructed including six attributes with varying levels. The PTT used identical risk and benefit attributes. For the DCE, a panel mixed-logit model was conducted, both mean and individual estimates were used to calculate maximum acceptable risk. For the PTT, interval regression was used to calculate maximum acceptable risk. Perceived complexity of the choice tasks and preference heterogeneity were investigated for both methods.ResultsMaximum acceptable risk confidence intervals of both methods overlapped for serious infection and serious side effects but not for mild side effects (maximum acceptable risk was 32.7 percent-points lower in the PTT). Although, both DCE and PTT tasks overall were considered easy or very easy to understand and answer, significantly more respondents rated the DCE choice tasks as easier to understand compared with those who rated the PTT as easier (7-percentage point difference; p < 0.05).ConclusionsMaximum acceptable risk estimate confidence intervals based on a DCE and a PTT overlapped for two out of the three included risk attributes. More respondents rated the DCE as easier to understand. This may suggest that the DCE is better suited in studies estimating maximum acceptable risk for multiple risk attributes of differing severity, while the PTT may be better suited when measuring heterogeneity in maximum acceptable risk estimates or when investigating one or more serious adverse events.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences (hsv//eng)
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Medicinsk etik (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Medical Ethics (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

  • Patient (Sök värdpublikationen i LIBRIS)

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy