SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(van Geest M)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(van Geest M) > (2020-2023) > Comparing probiotic...

Comparing probiotic and drug interventions in irritable bowel syndrome : a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

van der Geest, A. M. (författare)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Schukking, I. (författare)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Brummer, Robert Jan, 1957- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
visa fler...
van de Burgwal, L. H. M. (författare)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Larsen, O. F. A. (författare)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Institute, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2022
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Beneficial Microbes. - : Wageningen Academic Publishers. - 1876-2883 .- 1876-2891. ; 13:3, s. 183-194
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Clinical decisions made by health professionals to recommend either drug or probiotic interventions for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) should be supported by proper knowledge of the efficacy rates of both types of interventions. In this article, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine the efficacy of both probiotic- and drug interventions in IBS. Medline was searched between January 2015 - January 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) recruiting participants > 18 years old with IBS and examining the effect of probiotics or drugs were eligible for inclusion. The data of the primary outcome, i.e. the persistence of IBS symptoms (dichotomous symptom data), were pooled to obtain a relative risk (RR), with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Secondary outcomes, abdominal pain- and bloating scores (continuous data), were pooled using a standardised mean difference with a 95% CI. The search identified 269 citations of which 32 RCTs were eligible. Our meta-analysis indicated that both probiotic and drug interventions are able to improve the persistence of IBS symptoms (RR 0.60 [0.51; 0.92] versus 0.87 [0.81; 0.92], respectively) and abdominal pain scores (standardised mean difference (SMD) -0.35 [-0.56; -0.14] versus -0.10 [-0.20; 0.00], respectively). However, determining the overall efficacy of both intervention types is inherently complex and such results should be interpreted with care, due to the large diversity of probiotic- and drug types and doses, which is also complicated by variety in IBS subtypes. Hence, as a first step, more large scale randomised double blind placebo-controlled trials focussing on a specific IBS subtype targeted with specific probiotic strains or specific pharmaceutical modalities should be executed, enabling a more proper comparison between trials.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Gastroenterologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Gastroenterology and Hepatology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Burden to benefit ratio
drugs
efficacy
probiotics

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy