SwePub
Tyck till om SwePub Sök här!
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Valachis Antonis 1984 )
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Valachis Antonis 1984 ) > Randomized Versus R...

Randomized Versus Real-World Evidence on the Efficacy and Toxicity of Checkpoint Inhibitors in Cancer in Patients with Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer or Melanoma : A Meta-analysis

Digkas, Evangelos (författare)
Uppsala universitet,Institutionen för immunologi, genetik och patologi,Science for Life Laboratory, SciLifeLab
Tabiim, Anthony Jagri (författare)
Department of Surgery, Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana,Korle Bu Teaching Hosp, Dept Surg, Accra, Ghana.
Smith, Daniel (författare)
School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden,Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics,Örebro Univ, Sch Med Sci, Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Örebro, Sweden.
visa fler...
Valachis, Antonis, 1984- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper,Region Örebro län,Department of Oncology,Örebro Univ, Fac Med & Hlth, Dept Oncol, Örebro, Sweden.
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2022-08-01
2022
Engelska.
Ingår i: Targeted oncology. - : Springer. - 1776-2596 .- 1776-260X. ; 17:5, s. 507-515
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BACKGROUND: Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world evidence (RWE) studies provide results regarding the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients. The results from these two sources are considered complementary but whether they are comparable remains unknown.OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors between RCTs and RWE studies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma.PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies, either RCTs or RWE studies, investigating the efficacy or toxicity of checkpoint inhibitors given for indications that were approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) at the date of the last search. A meta-analysis was performed and the pooled estimates of objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity and treatment discontinuation between RCTs and RWE studies were compared.RESULTS: In total, 43 RWE studies and 15 RCTs were eligible, with adequate data for pooled estimates for immunotherapy indications regarding NSCLC and melanoma. No statistically significant or clinically meaningful differences in terms of pooled PFS, OS, or rates of treatment discontinuation due to toxicity between RCTs and RWE studies were observed. In some indications, a higher rate of response rates and lower rate of toxicity in favor of RWE was observed.CONCLUSION: In patients with melanoma or NSCLC, the clinical value of checkpoint inhibitors is evident in both RCTs and real-world settings. Some differences in response or toxicity rates in favor of RWE mainly reflects the inherent difficulties in evaluating these outcomes in RWE studies.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Cancer och onkologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Cancer and Oncology (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy