SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

AMNE:(MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP Klinisk medicin Dermatologi och venereologi)
 

Search: AMNE:(MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP Klinisk medicin Dermatologi och venereologi) > (2010-2014) > Validity of self-re...

  • Josefson, AnnaÖrebro universitet,Hälsoakademin (author)

Validity of self-reported nickel allergy

  • Article/chapterEnglish2010

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Oxford :Wiley,2010
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:oru-12502
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-12502URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2010.01702.xDOI
  • http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:120361555URI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Background: To estimate the prevalence of nickel allergy, self-reports are sometimes used in epidemiological studies. Self-reports are practical and may facilitate estimation of prevalence provided that the questions are validated.Objectives: To investigate the validity of self-reported nickel allergy.Methods: Three hundred and sixty-nine women, aged 30–40 years, from the general population participated in the study. The participants answered a questionnaire before a clinical examination and patch testing. The two questions being validated were ‘Are you sensitive/hypersensitive/allergic to nickel?’ and ‘Do you get a rash from metal buttons, jewellery or other metal items that come in direct contact with your skin?’Results: Patch test showed nickel-positive reaction in 30% of the subjects. Self-reported prevalence of nickel allergy as indicated by the two respective questions was 40% and 35%. Positive predictive values for the two questions were 59% (95% CI 50–67) and 60% (95% CI 51–69). History of childhood eczema was over-represented among women with ‘false-positive’ self-reported nickel allergy (P = 0.008). Self-reported hand eczema or ‘high wet exposure’ did not influence the validity.Conclusions: The validity of self-reported nickel allergy is low. The questions regarding nickel allergy overestimate the true prevalence of nickel allergy.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Färm, GunillaDept Dermatol, Karolinska Univ Hosp, Stockholm, Sweden (author)
  • Meding, BirgittaKarolinska Institutet (author)
  • Örebro universitetHälsoakademin (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Contact DermatitisOxford : Wiley62:5, s. 289-2930105-18731600-0536

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Josefson, Anna
Färm, Gunilla
Meding, Birgitta
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Clinical Medicin ...
and Dermatology and ...
Articles in the publication
Contact Dermatit ...
By the university
Örebro University
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view