SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Jansson Kjell)
 

Search: WFRF:(Jansson Kjell) > Diagnostic accuracy...

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain : prospective study and systematic review

Alshamari, Muhammed, 1975- (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
Norrman, Eva, 1967- (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Medical Physics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
Geijer, Mats, 1957- (author)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine
show more...
Jansson, Kjell (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
Geijer, Håkan, 1961- (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-09-18
2016
English.
In: European Radiology. - New York : Springer. - 0938-7994 .- 1432-1084. ; 26:6, s. 1766-1774
  • Research review (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Objectives: Abdominal radiography is frequently used in acute abdominal non-traumatic pain despite the availability of more advanced diagnostic modalities. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography, at similar radiation dose levels.Methods: Fifty-eight patients were imaged with both methods and were reviewed independently by three radiologists. The reference standard was obtained from the diagnosis in medical records. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A systematic review was performed after a literature search, finding a total of six relevant studies including the present.Results: Overall sensitivity with 95 % CI for CT was 75 % (66-83 %) and 46 % (37-56 %) for radiography. Specificity was 87 % (77-94 %) for both methods. In the systematic review the overall sensitivity for CT varied between 75 and 96 % with specificity from 83 to 95 % while the overall sensitivity for abdominal radiography varied between 30 and 77 % with specificity 75 to 88 %.Conclusions: Based on the current study and available evidence, low-dose CT has higher diagnostic accuracy than abdominal radiography and it should, where logistically possible, replace abdominal radiography in the workup of adult patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.Key points: • Low-dose CT has a higher diagnostic accuracy than radiography. • A systematic review shows that CT has better diagnostic accuracy than radiography. • Radiography has no place in the workup of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Keyword

X-ray computed tomography
abdominal radiography
sensitivity and specificity
abdominal pain
abdomen
acute
Radiology
Radiologi

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
for (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view