SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Jansson Kjell)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Jansson Kjell) > Diagnostic accuracy...

Diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography in non-traumatic acute abdominal pain : prospective study and systematic review

Alshamari, Muhammed, 1975- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
Norrman, Eva, 1967- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Medical Physics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
Geijer, Mats, 1957- (författare)
Lund University,Lunds universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi, Lund,Sektion V,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Lund,Medicinska fakulteten,Diagnostic Radiology, (Lund),Section V,Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund,Faculty of Medicine
visa fler...
Jansson, Kjell (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden
Geijer, Håkan, 1961- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskap och medicin,Department of Radiology, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,Datortomografi med låg stråldos(Lågdos-DT)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2015-09-18
2016
Engelska.
Ingår i: European Radiology. - New York : Springer. - 0938-7994 .- 1432-1084. ; 26:6, s. 1766-1774
  • Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Objectives: Abdominal radiography is frequently used in acute abdominal non-traumatic pain despite the availability of more advanced diagnostic modalities. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CT compared with abdominal radiography, at similar radiation dose levels.Methods: Fifty-eight patients were imaged with both methods and were reviewed independently by three radiologists. The reference standard was obtained from the diagnosis in medical records. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated. A systematic review was performed after a literature search, finding a total of six relevant studies including the present.Results: Overall sensitivity with 95 % CI for CT was 75 % (66-83 %) and 46 % (37-56 %) for radiography. Specificity was 87 % (77-94 %) for both methods. In the systematic review the overall sensitivity for CT varied between 75 and 96 % with specificity from 83 to 95 % while the overall sensitivity for abdominal radiography varied between 30 and 77 % with specificity 75 to 88 %.Conclusions: Based on the current study and available evidence, low-dose CT has higher diagnostic accuracy than abdominal radiography and it should, where logistically possible, replace abdominal radiography in the workup of adult patients with acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.Key points: • Low-dose CT has a higher diagnostic accuracy than radiography. • A systematic review shows that CT has better diagnostic accuracy than radiography. • Radiography has no place in the workup of acute non-traumatic abdominal pain.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

X-ray computed tomography
abdominal radiography
sensitivity and specificity
abdominal pain
abdomen
acute
Radiology
Radiologi

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
for (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy