SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Svantesson Mia 1960 )
 

Search: WFRF:(Svantesson Mia 1960 ) > Are religion and re...

Are religion and religiosity important to end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy in the ICU? : The Ethicatt study

Bulow, Hans-Henrik (author)
Intensive Care, Holbaek Hospital, Holbaek, Denmark
Sprung, Charles L. (author)
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Medical Center, Hadassah Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
Baras, Mario (author)
Hadassah School of Public Health, Hadassah Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
show more...
Carmel, Sara (author)
Centre for Multidisciplinary Research in Aging, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Negev, Israel
Svantesson, Mia, 1960- (author)
Region Örebro län,Örebro universitet, Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper,Centre for Health Care Research
Benbenishty, Julie (author)
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Maia, Paulo A. (author)
Department of Intensive Care, Centro Hospitalar, Hospital S. Antonio, Porto, Portugal
Beishuizen, Albertus (author)
Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Cohen, Simon (author)
Intensive Care Unit, University College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
Nalos, Daniel (author)
Krajská Zdravotní A.s., ARO Masarykova Nemocnice Ústí Nad, Labem, Czech Republic
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2012-04-14
2012
English.
In: Intensive Care Medicine. - : Springer. - 0342-4642 .- 1432-1238. ; 38:7, s. 1126-1133
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • This study explored differences in end-of-life (EOL) decisions and respect for patient autonomy of religious members versus those only affiliated to that particular religion (affiliated is a member without strong religious feelings).In 2005 structured questionnaires regarding EOL decisions were distributed in six European countries to ICUs in 142 hospital ICUs. This sub-study of the original data analyzed answers from Protestants, Catholics and Jews.A total of 304 physicians, 386 nurses, 248 patients and 330 family members were included in the study. Professionals wanted less treatment (ICU admission, CPR, ventilator treatment) than patients and family members. Religious respondents wanted more treatment and were more in favor of life prolongation, and they were less likely to want active euthanasia than those affiliated. Southern nurses and doctors favored euthanasia more than their Northern colleagues. Three quarters of doctors and nurses would respect a competent patient's refusal of a potentially life-saving treatment. No differences were found between religious and affiliated professionals regarding patient's autonomy. Inter-religious differences were detected, with Protestants most likely to follow competent patients' wishes and the Jewish respondents least likely to do so, and Jewish professionals more frequently accepting patients' wishes for futile treatment. However, these findings on autonomy were due to regional differences, not religious ones.Health-care professionals, families and patients who are religious will frequently want more extensive treatment than affiliated individuals. Views on active euthanasia are influenced by both religion and region, whereas views on patient autonomy are apparently more influenced by region.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Anestesi och intensivvård (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (hsv//eng)

Keyword

End-of-life
Religion
Intensive care
Autonomy
Euthanasia

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view