SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Nilsson Ulrica 1960 )
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Nilsson Ulrica 1960 ) > (2015-2019) > Cost-effectiveness ...

Cost-effectiveness of a systematic e-assessed follow-up of postoperative recovery after day surgery : a multicentre randomized trial

Dahlberg, Karuna, 1979- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper
Philipsson, Anna, 1978- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper,University Health Care Research Centre, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden
Hagberg, Lars, 1956- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper,Region Örebro län,University Health Care Research Centre, Region Örebro County, Örebro, Sweden
visa fler...
Jaensson, Maria, 1967- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper
Hälleberg Nyman, Maria, 1968- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper
Nilsson, Ulrica, 1960- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Oxford University Press, 2017
2017
Engelska.
Ingår i: British Journal of Anaesthesia. - : Oxford University Press. - 0007-0912 .- 1471-6771. ; 119:5, s. 1039-1046
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Most surgeries are done on a day-stay basis. Recovery assessment by phone points (RAPP) is a smartphonebased application (app) to evaluate patients after day surgery. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of using RAPP for follow-up on postoperative recovery compared with standard care.Methods: This study was a prospective parallel single-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention group using RAPP or the control group receiving standard care. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed based on individual data and included costs for the intervention, health effect [quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs)], and costs or savings in health-care use.Results: The mean cost for health-care consumption during 2 weeks after surgery was estimated at e37.29 for the intervention group and e60.96 for the control group. The mean difference was e23.66 (99% confidence interval 46.57 to0.76; P¼0.008). When including the costs of the intervention, the cost-effectiveness analysis showed net savings of e4.77 per patient in favour of the intervention. No difference in QALYs gained was seen between the groups (P¼0.75). The probability of the intervention being cost-effective was 71%.Conclusions: This study shows that RAPP can be cost-effective but had no effect on QALY. RAPP can be a cost-effective toolin providing low-cost health-care contacts and in systematically assessing the quality of postoperative recovery.Clinical trial registration:NCT02492191

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Anestesi och intensivvård (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Ambulatory surgery
cost effectiveness
mobile applications
postoperative period

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy