Discrimination between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths in CT using a deep neural network: more than local features needed

↓ Direkt till sidans innehåll
↓ Direkt till sidans sekundära innehåll (sidomenyn)

Search: WFRF:(Lidén Per) > Discrimination betw...

Details
MARC

Lidén, Mats,1976-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper (author)

Discrimination between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths in CT using a deep neural network : more than local features needed

Article/chapterEnglish2018

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

2018
printrdacarrier

Numbers

LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:oru-67372
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67372URI

Supplementary language notes

Language:English
Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

SwePubSwePub

Classification

Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
Subject category:kon swepub-publicationtype

Notes

Purpose: To develop a deep learning method for assisting radiologists in the discrimination between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths in thin slice CT images, and to evaluate whether this differentiation is possible using only local features.Methods and materials: A limited field-of-view image data bank was retrospectively created, consisting of 5x5x5 cm selections from 1 mm thick unenhanced CT images centered around 218 pelvis phleboliths and 267 distal ureteral stones in 336 patients. 50 stones and 50 phleboliths formed a validation cohort and the remainder a training cohort. Ground truth was established by a radiologist using the complete CT examination during inclusion.The limited field-of-view CT stacks were independently reviewed and classified as containing a distal ureteral stone or a phlebolith by seven radiologists. Each cropped stack consisted of 50 slices (5x5 cm field-of-view) and was displayed in a standard PACS reading environment. A convolutional neural network using three perpendicular images (2.5D-CNN) from the limited field-of-view CT stacks was trained for classification.Results: The 2.5D-CNN obtained 89% accuracy (95% confidence interval 81%-94%) for the classification in the unseen validation cohort while the accuracy of radiologists reviewing the same cohort was 86% (range 76%-91%). There was no statistically significant difference between 2.5D-CNN and radiologists.Conclusion: The 2.5D-CNN achieved radiologist level classification accuracy between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths when only using the local features. The mean accuracy of 86% for radiologists using limited field-of-view indicates that distant anatomical information that helps identifying the ureter’s course is needed.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

Jendeberg, Johan,1972-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper(Swepub:oru)jjg (author)
Längkvist, Martin,1983-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för naturvetenskap och teknik(Swepub:oru)milt (author)
Loutfi, Amy,1978-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för naturvetenskap och teknik(Swepub:oru)ali (author)
Thunberg, Per,1968-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper(Swepub:oru)prtg (author)
Örebro universitetInstitutionen för medicinska vetenskaper (creator_code:org_t)

Internet link

https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-67372

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor: Lidén, Mats, 197 ...; Jendeberg, Johan ...; Längkvist, Marti ...; Loutfi, Amy, 197 ...; Thunberg, Per, 1 ...

About the subject

MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES: MEDICAL AND HEAL ...; and Clinical Medicin ...; and Radiology Nuclea ...

By the university: Örebro University

Search outside SwePub

Extend your search to:: Google; Google Book Search; Google Scholar

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

LIBRIS.kb.se