SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Lidén Per)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Lidén Per) > Discrimination betw...

Discrimination between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths in CT using a deep neural network : more than local features needed

Lidén, Mats, 1976- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
Jendeberg, Johan, 1972- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
Längkvist, Martin, 1983- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för naturvetenskap och teknik
visa fler...
Loutfi, Amy, 1978- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för naturvetenskap och teknik
Thunberg, Per, 1968- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2018
2018
Engelska.
  • Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Purpose: To develop a deep learning method for assisting radiologists in the discrimination between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths in thin slice CT images, and to evaluate whether this differentiation is possible using only local features.Methods and materials: A limited field-of-view image data bank was retrospectively created, consisting of 5x5x5 cm selections from 1 mm thick unenhanced CT images centered around 218 pelvis phleboliths and 267 distal ureteral stones in 336 patients. 50 stones and 50 phleboliths formed a validation cohort and the remainder a training cohort. Ground truth was established by a radiologist using the complete CT examination during inclusion.The limited field-of-view CT stacks were independently reviewed and classified as containing a distal ureteral stone or a phlebolith by seven radiologists. Each cropped stack consisted of 50 slices (5x5 cm field-of-view) and was displayed in a standard PACS reading environment. A convolutional neural network using three perpendicular images (2.5D-CNN) from the limited field-of-view CT stacks was trained for classification.Results: The 2.5D-CNN obtained 89% accuracy (95% confidence interval 81%-94%) for the classification in the unseen validation cohort while the accuracy of radiologists reviewing the same cohort was 86% (range 76%-91%). There was no statistically significant difference between 2.5D-CNN and radiologists.Conclusion: The 2.5D-CNN achieved radiologist level classification accuracy between distal ureteral stones and pelvic phleboliths when only using the local features. The mean accuracy of 86% for radiologists using limited field-of-view indicates that distant anatomical information that helps identifying the ureter’s course is needed.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Radiologi och bildbehandling (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Medical Imaging (hsv//eng)

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
kon (ämneskategori)

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy