SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Svantesson Mia 1960 )
 

Search: WFRF:(Svantesson Mia 1960 ) > Important outcomes ...

Important outcomes of moral case deliberation : a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals' priorities

Svantesson, Mia, 1960- (author)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för hälsovetenskaper,Region Örebro län,University Health Care Research Center
de Snoo-Trimp, Janine C. (author)
Department of Medical Humanities, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Ursin, Göril (author)
Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
show more...
de Vet, Henrica Cw (author)
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Brinchmann, Berit S. (author)
Nordland Hospital Trust, Nord University, Bodø, Norway
Molewijk, Bert (author)
Department of Medical Humanities, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Center of Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-07-18
2019
English.
In: Journal of Medical Ethics. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 0306-6800 .- 1473-4257. ; 45:9, s. 608-616
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • BACKGROUND: There is a lack of empirical research regarding the outcomes of such clinical ethics support methods as moral case deliberation (MCD). Empirical research in how healthcare professionals perceive potential outcomes is needed in order to evaluate the value and effectiveness of ethics support; and help to design future outcomes research. The aim was to use the European Moral Case Deliberation Outcome Instrument (Euro-MCD) instrument to examine the importance of various MCD outcomes, according to healthcare professionals, prior to participation.METHODS: A North European field survey among healthcare professionals drawn from 73 workplaces in a variety of healthcare settings in the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. The Euro-MCD instrument was used.RESULTS: All outcomes regarding the domains of moral reflexivity, moral attitude, emotional support, collaboration, impact at organisational level and concrete results, were perceived as very or quite important by 76%-97% of the 703 respondents. Outcomes regarding collaboration and concrete results were perceived as most important. Outcomes assessed as least important were mostly about moral attitude. 'Better interactions with patient/family' emerged as a new domain from the qualitative analysis. Dutch respondents perceived most of the outcomes as significantly less important than the Scandinavians, especially regarding emotional support. Furthermore, men, those who were younger, and physician-respondents scored most of the outcomes as statistically significantly less important compared with the other respondents.CONCLUSIONS: attitude outcomes, should still be included. In the future, a combination of empirical findings (practice) and normative reflection (theories) will contribute to the revision of the instrument.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Medicinsk etik (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Medical Ethics (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Applied and professional ethics
clinical ethics
education for health care professionals
ethics committees/consultation
health personnel

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view