SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Elo S)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Elo S) > (2020-2023) > Systematic evaluati...

  • Mehmood, ArfaTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland; Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland (författare)

Systematic evaluation of differential splicing tools for RNA-seq studies

  • Artikel/kapitelEngelska2020

Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...

  • 2019-12-05
  • Oxford University Press,2020
  • printrdacarrier

Nummerbeteckningar

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:oru-78549
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-78549URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbz126DOI

Kompletterande språkuppgifter

  • Språk:engelska
  • Sammanfattning på:engelska

Ingår i deldatabas

Klassifikation

  • Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype

Anmärkningar

  • Funding Agencies:European Research Council (ERC)677943Academy of Finland 296801 304995 314443 310561Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation 2-2013-32Finnish Funding Agency for Technology & Innovation (TEKES) 1877/31/2016Sigrid Juselius FoundationTurku Graduate School  University of Turku  Åbo Akademi University  Biocenter Finland  ELIXIR Finland 
  • Differential splicing (DS) is a post-transcriptional biological process with critical, wide-ranging effects on a plethora of cellular activities and disease processes. To date, a number of computational approaches have been developed to identify and quantify differentially spliced genes from RNA-seq data, but a comprehensive intercomparison and appraisal of these approaches is currently lacking. In this study, we systematically evaluated 10 DS analysis tools for consistency and reproducibility, precision, recall and false discovery rate, agreement upon reported differentially spliced genes and functional enrichment. The tools were selected to represent the three different methodological categories: exon-based (DEXSeq, edgeR, JunctionSeq, limma), isoform-based (cuffdiff2, DiffSplice) and event-based methods (dSpliceType, MAJIQ, rMATS, SUPPA). Overall, all the exon-based methods and two event-based methods (MAJIQ and rMATS) scored well on the selected measures. Of the 10 tools tested, the exon-based methods performed generally better than the isoform-based and event-based methods. However, overall, the different data analysis tools performed strikingly differently across different data sets or numbers of samples.

Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar

Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)

  • Laiho, AstaTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland (författare)
  • Venäläinen, Mikko S.Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland (författare)
  • McGlinchey, Aidan J.,1984-Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper,Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland(Swepub:oru)anmy (författare)
  • Wang, NingTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland (författare)
  • Elo, Laura L.Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland (författare)
  • Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland; Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Turku, FinlandTurku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland (creator_code:org_t)

Sammanhörande titlar

  • Ingår i:Briefings in Bioinformatics: Oxford University Press21:6, s. 2052-20651467-54631477-4054

Internetlänk

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy