SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Laiho Asta)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Laiho Asta) > Systematic evaluati...

Systematic evaluation of differential splicing tools for RNA-seq studies

Mehmood, Arfa (författare)
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland; Department of Physiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
Laiho, Asta (författare)
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
Venäläinen, Mikko S. (författare)
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
visa fler...
McGlinchey, Aidan J., 1984- (författare)
Örebro universitet,Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper,Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
Wang, Ning (författare)
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
Elo, Laura L. (författare)
Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2019-12-05
2020
Engelska.
Ingår i: Briefings in Bioinformatics. - : Oxford University Press. - 1467-5463 .- 1477-4054. ; 21:6, s. 2052-2065
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Differential splicing (DS) is a post-transcriptional biological process with critical, wide-ranging effects on a plethora of cellular activities and disease processes. To date, a number of computational approaches have been developed to identify and quantify differentially spliced genes from RNA-seq data, but a comprehensive intercomparison and appraisal of these approaches is currently lacking. In this study, we systematically evaluated 10 DS analysis tools for consistency and reproducibility, precision, recall and false discovery rate, agreement upon reported differentially spliced genes and functional enrichment. The tools were selected to represent the three different methodological categories: exon-based (DEXSeq, edgeR, JunctionSeq, limma), isoform-based (cuffdiff2, DiffSplice) and event-based methods (dSpliceType, MAJIQ, rMATS, SUPPA). Overall, all the exon-based methods and two event-based methods (MAJIQ and rMATS) scored well on the selected measures. Of the 10 tools tested, the exon-based methods performed generally better than the isoform-based and event-based methods. However, overall, the different data analysis tools performed strikingly differently across different data sets or numbers of samples.

Ämnesord

TEKNIK OCH TEKNOLOGIER  -- Industriell bioteknik -- Medicinsk bioteknik (hsv//swe)
ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY  -- Industrial Biotechnology -- Medical Biotechnology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

RNA-seq
differential splicing
event-based methods
exon-based methods
isoform-based methods
splicing events

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy