SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

L773:1360 8592 OR L773:1532 9283
 

Sökning: L773:1360 8592 OR L773:1532 9283 > Psychometric proper...

Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the revised neurophysiology of pain questionnaire

Reynebeau, Iris (författare)
van Buchem, Bart (författare)
Jager, Karin (författare)
visa fler...
Lexmond, Wendy (författare)
Leysen, Laurence (författare)
Munneke, Wouter (författare)
Nijs, Jo (författare)
Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation
Roose, Eva (författare)
Lahousse, Astrid (författare)
De Kooning, Margot (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2024
2024
Engelska.
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES. - 1360-8592 .- 1532-9283. ; 40, s. 777-785
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: Understanding pain and its mechanisms can play an important role in (post-) cancer rehabilitation. In order to test patient's knowledge of pain, the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire was developed and translated into Dutch (RNPQ-NL). However, its psychometric properties have not been examined yet. Objective: The goal is to examine the psychometric properties of the RNPQ-NL as a tool to measure the knowledge of pain; in addition, its cross-cultural validity between Belgian and Dutch participants is examined. Methods: 277 persons from Belgium and the Netherlands participated in this study. Cancer patients and survivors (CPaS) (n=115) were compared to a group of experts with medical training (n=97). Highly educated individuals without medical background (n=65) served as control group. The RNPQ-NL was filled out twice and scores analysed in accordance with the COSMIN-recommendation for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status instruments. Results: The RNPQ-NL was able to distinguish between high and low knowledge of pain. The CPaS group scored significantly lower on the RNPQ-NL compared to the expert group (p<0.001), but not in comparison to the control group (p=1.00). The Belgian CPaS scored lower than the Dutch CPaS (p=0.001), with a medium effect size (d=0.481), showing acceptable cross-cultural validity. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.625, showing some heterogeneity of the items. The test-retest reliability was adequate (ICC=0.794). Conclusion: This study supports the interpretability, test-retest reliability, discriminative, and cross-cultural validity of the RNPQ-NL. Internal consistency is suboptimal but acceptable for measuring the knowledge of pain in CPaS.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Neurophysiology of pain questionnaire (NPQ)
Pain mechanisms
Pain education
Cancer

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy