Sökning: L773:1360 8592 OR L773:1532 9283 >
Psychometric proper...
Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the revised neurophysiology of pain questionnaire
-
Reynebeau, Iris (författare)
-
van Buchem, Bart (författare)
-
Jager, Karin (författare)
-
visa fler...
-
Lexmond, Wendy (författare)
-
Leysen, Laurence (författare)
-
Munneke, Wouter (författare)
-
- Nijs, Jo (författare)
- Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för neurovetenskap och fysiologi, sektionen för hälsa och rehabilitering,Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation
-
Roose, Eva (författare)
-
Lahousse, Astrid (författare)
-
De Kooning, Margot (författare)
-
visa färre...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- 2024
- 2024
- Engelska.
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES. - 1360-8592 .- 1532-9283. ; 40, s. 777-785
- Relaterad länk:
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se...
-
visa fler...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
visa färre...
Abstract
Ämnesord
Stäng
- Background: Understanding pain and its mechanisms can play an important role in (post-) cancer rehabilitation. In order to test patient's knowledge of pain, the Revised Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire was developed and translated into Dutch (RNPQ-NL). However, its psychometric properties have not been examined yet. Objective: The goal is to examine the psychometric properties of the RNPQ-NL as a tool to measure the knowledge of pain; in addition, its cross-cultural validity between Belgian and Dutch participants is examined. Methods: 277 persons from Belgium and the Netherlands participated in this study. Cancer patients and survivors (CPaS) (n=115) were compared to a group of experts with medical training (n=97). Highly educated individuals without medical background (n=65) served as control group. The RNPQ-NL was filled out twice and scores analysed in accordance with the COSMIN-recommendation for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status instruments. Results: The RNPQ-NL was able to distinguish between high and low knowledge of pain. The CPaS group scored significantly lower on the RNPQ-NL compared to the expert group (p<0.001), but not in comparison to the control group (p=1.00). The Belgian CPaS scored lower than the Dutch CPaS (p=0.001), with a medium effect size (d=0.481), showing acceptable cross-cultural validity. The Cronbach's alpha was 0.625, showing some heterogeneity of the items. The test-retest reliability was adequate (ICC=0.794). Conclusion: This study supports the interpretability, test-retest reliability, discriminative, and cross-cultural validity of the RNPQ-NL. Internal consistency is suboptimal but acceptable for measuring the knowledge of pain in CPaS.
Ämnesord
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Klinisk medicin (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Clinical Medicine (hsv//eng)
Nyckelord
- Neurophysiology of pain questionnaire (NPQ)
- Pain mechanisms
- Pain education
- Cancer
Publikations- och innehållstyp
- ref (ämneskategori)
- art (ämneskategori)
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas
- Av författaren/redakt...
-
Reynebeau, Iris
-
van Buchem, Bart
-
Jager, Karin
-
Lexmond, Wendy
-
Leysen, Laurence
-
Munneke, Wouter
-
visa fler...
-
Nijs, Jo
-
Roose, Eva
-
Lahousse, Astrid
-
De Kooning, Marg ...
-
visa färre...
- Om ämnet
-
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
-
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
-
och Klinisk medicin
- Artiklar i publikationen
-
JOURNAL OF BODYW ...
- Av lärosätet
-
Göteborgs universitet