SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Lindskog Anders)
 

Search: WFRF:(Lindskog Anders) > (2000-2004) > Patient-controlled ...

Patient-controlled versus nurse-controlled pain treatment after coronary artery bypass surgery

Holmér Pettersson, Pia (author)
Department of Surgical Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Division of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm
Anjou Lindskog, Elisabet (author)
Öwall, Anders (author)
Karolinska Institutet
 (creator_code:org_t)
2001-12-24
2000
English.
In: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. - : Wiley. - 0001-5172 .- 1399-6576. ; 44:1, s. 43-47
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • Background: Pain after coronary artery bypass surgery persists for several days. A continuous intravenous infusion of an opioid adequately accomplishes good pain control in the intensive care unit, but it is often not suitable on the ordinary ward. Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intermittent injections delivered by one of the new devices now available could be an alternative to conventional nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA) based on intermittent injections. The aim was to compare these two techniques with respect to efficacy and the amount of opioid used.Methods: Forty-eight patients randomly received PCA or NCA with ketobemidone following extubation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Drug consumption, pain assessment with the visual analogue score (VAS) and possible side effects were evaluated from extubation to the end of the second postoperative day.Results: On the day of surgery the VAS scores did not differ between the groups. From the afternoon of the first postoperative day the VAS scores were higher in the NCA group with mean values at 3–4 out of 10 as compared with mean values around 2 in the PCA group (P<0.01). During the study period the patients in the PCA group received more ketobemidone as compared with the NCA group, 61.9±24.0 mg and 36.3±20.2 mg, respectively (P<0.01). Additional oral analgesics were used in 12 of the patients in the NCA group compared with none in the PCA group. The few side effects reported were equally distributed between the two groups.Conclusion: PCA treatment after coronary artery bypass surgery resulted in better pain treatment and the use of more opioid without an increase in side effects compared with traditional NCA treatment.

Subject headings

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Omvårdnad (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Nursing (hsv//eng)

Keyword

postoperative pain
postoperative analgesia
pain management
coronary artery bypass surgery
patient-controlled analgesia
opioids

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Holmér Pettersso ...
Anjou Lindskog, ...
Öwall, Anders
About the subject
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
MEDICAL AND HEAL ...
and Health Sciences
and Nursing
Articles in the publication
Acta Anaesthesio ...
By the university
Red Cross University College
Karolinska Institutet

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view