SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Donges Jonathan)
 

Search: WFRF:(Donges Jonathan) > Complex networks fo...

Complex networks for climate model evaluation with application to statistical versus dynamical modeling of South American climate

Feldhoff, Jan H. (author)
Lange, Stefan (author)
Volkholz, Jan (author)
show more...
Donges, Jonathan F. (author)
Stockholms universitet,Stockholm Resilience Centre,Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany
Kurths, Juergen (author)
Gerstengarbe, Friedrich-Wilhelm (author)
show less...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-05-31
2015
English.
In: Climate Dynamics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0930-7575 .- 1432-0894. ; 44:06-maj, s. 1567-1581
  • Journal article (peer-reviewed)
Abstract Subject headings
Close  
  • In this study we introduce two new node-weighted difference measures on complex networks as a tool for climate model evaluation. The approach facilitates the quantification of a model's ability to reproduce the spatial covariability structure of climatological time series. We apply our methodology to compare the performance of a statistical and a dynamical regional climate model simulating the South American climate, as represented by the variables 2 m temperature, precipitation, sea level pressure, and geopotential height field at 500 hPa. For each variable, networks are constructed from the model outputs and evaluated against a reference network, derived from the ERA-Interim reanalysis, which also drives the models. We compare two network characteristics, the (linear) adjacency structure and the (nonlinear) clustering structure, and relate our findings to conventional methods of model evaluation. To set a benchmark, we construct different types of random networks and compare them alongside the climate model networks. Our main findings are: (1) The linear network structure is better reproduced by the statistical model statistical analogue resampling scheme (STARS) in summer and winter for all variables except the geopotential height field, where the dynamical model CCLM prevails. (2) For the nonlinear comparison, the seasonal differences are more pronounced and CCLM performs almost as well as STARS in summer (except for sea level pressure), while STARS performs better in winter for all variables.

Subject headings

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Keyword

Climate model evaluation
Complex networks
South American climate
Network comparison

Publication and Content Type

ref (subject category)
art (subject category)

Find in a library

To the university's database

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view