SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

WFRF:(Pogue Jamie R.)
 

Search: WFRF:(Pogue Jamie R.) > Virtual reality exp...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Carl, Emily (author)

Virtual reality exposure therapy for anxiety and related disorders : A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Article/chapterEnglish2019

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • Elsevier BV,2019
  • printrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:su-164064
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-164064URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.08.003DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • Trials of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) for anxiety-related disorders have proliferated in number and diversity since our previous meta-analysis that examined 13 total trials, most of which were for specific phobias (Powers & Emmelkamp, 2008). Since then, new trials have compared VRET to more diverse anxiety and related disorders including social anxiety disorder (SAD), posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and panic disorder (PD) with and without agoraphobia. With the availability of this data, it is imperative to re-examine the efficacy of VRET for anxiety. A literature search for randomized controlled trials of VRET versus control or in vivo exposure yielded 30 studies with 1057 participants. Fourteen studies tested VRET for specific phobias, 8 for SAD or performance anxiety, 5 for PTSD, and 3 for PD. A random effects analysis estimated a large effect size for VRET versus waitlist (g = 0.90) and a medium to large effect size for VRET versus psychological placebo conditions (g = 0.78). A comparison of VRET and in vivo conditions did not show significantly different effect sizes (g = −0.07). These findings were relatively consistent across disorders. A meta-regression analysis revealed that larger sample sizes were associated with lower effect sizes in VRET versus control comparisons (β = −0.007, p <  0.05). These results indicate that VRET is an effective and equal medium for exposure therapy.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Stein, Aliza T. (author)
  • Levihn-Coon, Andrew (author)
  • Pogue, Jamie R. (author)
  • Rothbaum, Barbara (author)
  • Emmelkamp, Paul (author)
  • Asmundson, Gordon J. G. (author)
  • Carlbring, PerStockholms universitet,Klinisk psykologi,University of Southern Denmark, Denmark(Swepub:su)pecar (author)
  • Powers, Mark B. (author)
  • Stockholms universitetKlinisk psykologi (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Journal of Anxiety Disorders: Elsevier BV61, s. 27-360887-61851873-7897

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view