SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Extended search

id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-117541"
 

Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-117541" > Ecological restorat...

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist
  • Baker, Susan,1954-Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales U.K. (author)

Ecological restoration success : a policy analysis understanding

  • Article/chapterEnglish2016

Publisher, publication year, extent ...

  • 2016-02-09
  • Wiley-Blackwell,2016
  • electronicrdacarrier

Numbers

  • LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-117541
  • https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-117541URI
  • https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12339DOI

Supplementary language notes

  • Language:English
  • Summary in:English

Part of subdatabase

Classification

  • Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
  • Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype

Notes

  • This article discusses how ecological restoration success can be understood and evaluated using a policy analysis lens. First, this article details a conceptual tool that helps to develop a more encompassing set of criteria to assess restoration activities that provide socioeconomic benefits. Second, by broadening the understanding of restoration success and how it can be evaluated, it allows a more critical view of evaluation itself and its uses as a policy tool. A table is presented that can help practitioners reveal preferences and clarify the aims and objectives of particular initiatives. The table also sensitizes practitioners to the complexity of the links between restoration rationales and evaluation criteria, which in turn may open up much needed discussion and dialogue between restoration participants about the underlying values an actor may wish to promote. It heightens awareness of the fact that evaluation methods need to recognize that restoration is driven by multiple rationales often in the same project, both process driven and output oriented, which in turn can change over time. Adding process and output criteria together may also raise issues of priority. Evaluation criteria thus need to be assigned in ways that reflect these multiplicities, while at the same time recognizing that some restoration values might be conflictual and that there may be winners and losers. Furthermore, judgement about "failure" of a project can change as new goals emerge in delivery and implementation. Ecological restoration evaluation should therefore be ongoing, contextual, and not a one-off event.

Subject headings and genre

Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)

  • Eckerberg, Katarina,1953-Umeå universitet,Statsvetenskapliga institutionen(Swepub:umu)kaec0001 (author)
  • Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales U.K.Statsvetenskapliga institutionen (creator_code:org_t)

Related titles

  • In:Restoration Ecology: Wiley-Blackwell24:3, s. 284-2901061-29711526-100X

Internet link

Find in a library

To the university's database

  • 1 of 1
  • Previous record
  • Next record
  •    To hitlist

Find more in SwePub

By the author/editor
Baker, Susan, 19 ...
Eckerberg, Katar ...
About the subject
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Biological Scien ...
and Ecology
NATURAL SCIENCES
NATURAL SCIENCES
and Earth and Relate ...
and Environmental Sc ...
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SOCIAL SCIENCES
and Political Scienc ...
Articles in the publication
Restoration Ecol ...
By the university
Umeå University

Search outside SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Close

Copy and save the link in order to return to this view