Sökning: WFRF:(Rasmussen Barr Eva) >
Intra- and inter-ra...
-
Jonsson, AndersUmeå universitet,Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering
(författare)
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of movement and palpation tests in patients with neck pain : A systematic review
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2018
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
2017-11-07
-
TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC,2018
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-144359
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-144359URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2017.1390806DOI
-
http://kipublications.ki.se/Default.aspx?queryparsed=id:137442565URI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Neck pain is common and often becomes chronic. Various clinical tests of the cervical spine are used to direct and evaluate treatment. This systematic review aimed to identify studies examining the intra- and/or interrater reliability of tests used in clinical examination of patients with neck pain. A database search up to April 2016 was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and AMED. The Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies Checklist (QAREL) was used to assess risk of bias. Eleven studies were included, comprising tests of active and passive movement and pain evaluating participants with ongoing neck pain. One study was assessed with a low risk of bias, three with medium risk, while the rest were assessed with high risk of bias. The results showed differing reliabilities for the included tests ranging from poor to almost perfect. In conclusion, active movement and pain for pain or mobility overall presented acceptable to very good reliability (Kappa >0.40); while passive intervertebral tests had lower Kappa values, suggesting poor reliability. It may be a coincidence that the studies indicating very good reliability tended to be of higher quality (low to moderate risk of bias), while studies finding poor reliability tended to be of lower quality (high risk of bias). Regardless, the current recommendation from this review would suggest the clinical use of tests with acceptable reliability and avoiding the use of tests that have been shown to not be reliable. Finally, it is critical that all future reliability studies are of higher quality with low risk of bias.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Rasmussen-Barr, EvaKarolinska Institutet
(författare)
-
Umeå universitetInstitutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Physiotherapy Theory and Practice: TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC34:3, s. 165-1800959-39851532-5040
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas