Sökning: L773:1433 3023 >
Patient-reported ou...
-
Campbell, JenniferGothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(författare)
Patient-reported outcomes after sacrospinous fixation of vault prolapse with a suturing device : a retrospective national cohort study
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2018
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
2017-10-07
-
Springer,2018
-
printrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-148015
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-148015URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3491-4DOI
-
https://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/261444URI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Introduction and hypothesis: Innovations in suturing devices have facilitated sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSF) for the correction of vaginal vault prolapse. It is uncertain if outcomes using suturing devices differ from those using a traditional suturing technique. We hypothesize that no difference exists in the efficacy and safety 1 year after SSF for vault prolapse performed with suturing devices or using a traditional technique. The objective was to compare SSF using a suturing device with traditional SSF for the treatment of vault prolapse, regarding symptoms of prolapse recurrence, patient satisfaction, incidence of re-operation, and complications 1 year postoperatively.Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study using register-based national data from 2006 to 2013. The Swedish Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery includes assessments pre-operatively, at hospital admittance, surgery, discharge, and questionnaires at 8 weeks and 1 year after surgery. Demographic variables and surgical methods were included in multivariate logistic regression analyses.Results: In the suturing device group (SDG, n = 353), 71.5% were asymptomatic of recurrence after 1 year compared with 78.7% in the traditional SSF group (TSG, n = 195); risk difference - 7.3% (95%CI -15.2%; 0.7%). Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for being asymptomatic 1 year postoperatively was 0.56 (95%CI 0.31; 1.02, p = 0.057). Patient satisfaction was similar in SDG and TSG (78.1% vs 78.4%). Reoperation occurred in 7.4% in the SDG compared with 3.6% in the TSG, risk difference 3.8% (95%CI 0.0%; 7.5%), aOR 3.55 (95%CI 1.10; 11.44, p = 0.03).Conclusions: Patient satisfaction was similar 1 year after SSF, despite symptoms of recurrence being more likely and reoperation more common after using a suturing device compared with a traditional technique. The methods did not differ with regard to surgical complications.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Pedroletti, Corinne
(författare)
-
Ekhed, Linn
(författare)
-
Nüssler, EmilUmeå universitet,Obstetrik och gynekologi,National Quality Register of Gynecological Surgery, Umeå, Sweden(Swepub:umu)emnu0003
(författare)
-
Strandell, Annika,1956Gothenburg University,Göteborgs universitet,Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi,Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology(Swepub:gu)xsannb
(författare)
-
Göteborgs universitetInstitutionen för kliniska vetenskaper, Avdelningen för obstetrik och gynekologi
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:International Urogynecology Journal: Springer29:6, s. 821-8290937-34621433-3023
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas