Search: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:umu-186957" >
Fringe or Not Fring...
-
Fjellfeldt, MariaHögskolan Dalarna,Socialt arbete,Dalarna University, SWE
(author)
Fringe or Not Fringe? : Strategies for Localizing Supported Accommodation in a Post‐Deinstitutional Era
- Article/chapterEnglish2021
Publisher, publication year, extent ...
-
2021-08-26
-
Lisbon, Portugal :Cogitatio Press,2021
-
electronicrdacarrier
Numbers
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-186957
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186957URI
-
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v9i3.4319DOI
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-37974URI
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-22015URI
Supplementary language notes
-
Language:English
-
Summary in:English
Part of subdatabase
Classification
-
Subject category:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Subject category:art swepub-publicationtype
Notes
-
open access
-
Finding suitable locations for supported accommodations is crucial both for the wellbeing of individuals with psychiatric disabilities (PD) and to achieve the objectives of the mental health care reform in order to create opportunities for social inclusion. This article explores municipal strategies for localizing supported accommodations for people with PD. In a multiple case study, interviews with 20 municipal civil servants from social services and urban planning were conducted. Three strategies were identified and further analyzed with a public location theory approach: (1) re‐use, i.e., using existing facilities for a new purpose, (2) fill‐in, i.e., infilling new purpose‐built facilities in existing neighborhoods, and (3) insert, i.e., inserting new premises or facilities as part of a new development. The article shows that the “re‐use” strategy was employed primarily for pragmatic reasons, but also because re‐using former care facilities was found to cause less conflicts, as residents were supposedly used to neighbors with special needs. When the “fill‐in” and “insert” strategies were employed, new accommodations were more often located on the outskirts of neighborhoods. This was a way to balance potential conflicts between residents in ordinary housing and residents in supported accommodations, but also to meet alleged viewpoints of service users’ need for a quiet and secluded accommodation. Furthermore, ideas associated with social services’ view of social inclusion and urban planning’s notion of “tricky” tenants significantly influenced localization strategies. Finally, this article is also a call for more empirical research on the decision‐making processes, use of strategies (intended or not) and spatial outcomes, when localizing supported accommodation for people with PD and other groups in need of support and service.
Subject headings and genre
Added entries (persons, corporate bodies, meetings, titles ...)
-
Högström, EbbaBlekinge Tekniska Högskola,Institutionen för fysisk planering(Swepub:bth)EHO
(author)
-
Berglund Snodgrass, Lina,1980-Blekinge Tekniska Högskola,Institutionen för fysisk planering(Swepub:bth)LBS
(author)
-
Markström, UrbanUmeå universitet,Institutionen för socialt arbete,Umeå University, SWE(Swepub:umu)urma0001
(author)
-
Högskolan DalarnaSocialt arbete
(creator_code:org_t)
Related titles
-
In:Social InclusionLisbon, Portugal : Cogitatio Press9:3, s. 201-2132183-2803
Internet link
Find in a library
To the university's database