Search: WFRF:(Altenburg Teatske M) >
Systematic review o...
Systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health
-
- Messiha, Katrina (author)
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
- Chinapaw, Mai J. M. (author)
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
- Ket, Hans C. F. F. (author)
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
show more...
-
- An, Qingfan, 1997- (author)
- Umeå universitet,Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering
-
- Anand-Kumar, Vinayak (author)
- Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
-
- Longworth, Giuliana R. (author)
- Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
-
- Chastin, Sebastien (author)
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; Department of Movement and Sports Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
-
- Altenburg, Teatske M. (author)
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
-
show less...
-
(creator_code:org_t)
- Oxford University Press, 2023
- 2023
- English.
-
In: Journal of Public Health. - : Oxford University Press. - 1741-3842 .- 1741-3850. ; 45:3, s. 723-737
- Related links:
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show more...
-
https://umu.diva-por... (primary) (Raw object)
-
https://urn.kb.se/re...
-
https://doi.org/10.1...
-
show less...
Abstract
Subject headings
Close
- Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research.Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed.Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating.Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.
Subject headings
- MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP -- Hälsovetenskap -- Hälso- och sjukvårdsorganisation, hälsopolitik och hälsoekonomi (hsv//swe)
- MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES -- Health Sciences -- Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy (hsv//eng)
Keyword
- co-creation
- co-design
- co-production
- public health
- theoretical framework
- theory
Publication and Content Type
- ref (subject category)
- art (subject category)
Find in a library
To the university's database