Sökning: WFRF:(Altenburg Teatske M) >
Systematic review o...
-
Messiha, KatrinaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(författare)
Systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health
- Artikel/kapitelEngelska2023
Förlag, utgivningsår, omfång ...
-
Oxford University Press,2023
-
electronicrdacarrier
Nummerbeteckningar
-
LIBRIS-ID:oai:DiVA.org:umu-208117
-
https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-208117URI
-
https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046DOI
Kompletterande språkuppgifter
-
Språk:engelska
-
Sammanfattning på:engelska
Ingår i deldatabas
Klassifikation
-
Ämneskategori:ref swepub-contenttype
-
Ämneskategori:art swepub-publicationtype
Anmärkningar
-
Background: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research.Methods: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed.Results: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating.Conclusion: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.
Ämnesord och genrebeteckningar
Biuppslag (personer, institutioner, konferenser, titlar ...)
-
Chinapaw, Mai J. M.Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(författare)
-
Ket, Hans C. F. F.Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(författare)
-
An, Qingfan,1997-Umeå universitet,Institutionen för samhällsmedicin och rehabilitering(Swepub:umu)qian0002
(författare)
-
Anand-Kumar, VinayakDepartment of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
(författare)
-
Longworth, Giuliana R.Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany
(författare)
-
Chastin, SebastienSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK; Department of Movement and Sports Science, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
(författare)
-
Altenburg, Teatske M.Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(författare)
-
Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsMedical Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
(creator_code:org_t)
Sammanhörande titlar
-
Ingår i:Journal of Public Health: Oxford University Press45:3, s. 723-7371741-38421741-3850
Internetlänk
Hitta via bibliotek
Till lärosätets databas