SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Bodlund Owe)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Bodlund Owe) > Comparison of two s...

Comparison of two self-rating scales to detect depression : HADS and PHQ-9

Hansson, Maja, 1980- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Psykiatri
Chotai, Jayanti (författare)
Umeå universitet,Psykiatri
Nordström, Annika (författare)
County Council of Västerbotten, Umeå, Sweden
visa fler...
Bodlund, Owe (författare)
Umeå universitet,Psykiatri
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Royal College of General Practitioners, 2009
2009
Engelska.
Ingår i: British Journal of General Practice. - : Royal College of General Practitioners. - 0960-1643 .- 1478-5242. ; 59:566, s. e283-e288
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BACKGROUND: More than half of patients with depression go undetected. Self-rating scales can be useful in screening for depression, and measuring severity and treatment outcome. AIM: This study compares the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) with regard to their psychometric properties, and investigates their agreement at different cut-off scores. METHOD: Swedish primary care patients and psychiatric outpatients (n = 737) who reported symptoms of depression completed the self-rating scales. Data were collected from 2006 to 2007. Analyses with respect to internal consistency, factor analysis, and agreement (Cohen's kappa) at recommended cut-offs were performed. RESULTS: Both scales had high internal consistency (alpha = 0.9) and stable factor structures. Using severity cut-offs, the PHQ-9 (> or =5) diagnosed about 30% more patients than the HADS depression subscale (HADS-D; > or =8). They recognised the same prevalence of mild and moderate depression, but differed in relation to severe depression. When comparing recommended screening cut-offs, HADS-D > or =11 (33.5% of participants) and PHQ-9 > or =10 (65.9%) agreement was low (kappa = 0.35). Using the lower recommended cut-off in the HADS-D (> or =8), agreement with PHQ-9 > or =10 was moderate (kappa = 0.52). The highest agreement (kappa = 0.56) was found comparing HADS-D > or =8 with PHQ-9 > or =12. This also equalised the prevalence of depression found by the scales. CONCLUSION: The HADS and PHQ-9 are both quick and reliable. The HADS has the advantage of evaluating both depression and anxiety, and the PHQ-9 of being strictly based upon the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The agreement between the scales at the best suitable cut-off is moderate, although the identified prevalence was similar. This indicates that the scales do not fully identify the same cases. This difference needs to be further explored.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Klinisk medicin -- Psykiatri (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Clinical Medicine -- Psychiatry (hsv//eng)
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi -- Tillämpad psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology -- Applied Psychology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

depression
primary health care
psychometrics
self-assessment

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Hansson, Maja, 1 ...
Chotai, Jayanti
Nordström, Annik ...
Bodlund, Owe
Om ämnet
MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP
MEDICIN OCH HÄLS ...
och Klinisk medicin
och Psykiatri
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKA ...
och Psykologi
och Tillämpad psykol ...
Artiklar i publikationen
British Journal ...
Av lärosätet
Umeå universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy