SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(De Lucia Rolfe Emanuella)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(De Lucia Rolfe Emanuella) > Computed tomography...

Computed tomography-based validation of abdominal adiposity measurements from ultrasonography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and anthropometry

Gradmark, Anna M I, 1981- (författare)
Umeå universitet,Medicin
Rydh, Anders (författare)
Umeå universitet,Diagnostisk radiologi
Renström, Frida (författare)
Umeå universitet,Medicin
visa fler...
De Lucia-Rolfe, Emanuella (författare)
Sleigh, Alison (författare)
Nordström, Peter (författare)
Umeå universitet,Geriatrik
Brage, Sören (författare)
Franks, Paul W (författare)
Umeå universitet,Medicin
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2010
2010
Engelska.
Ingår i: British Journal of Nutrition. - 0007-1145 .- 1475-2662. ; 104:4, s. 582-588
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Large-scale aetiological studies of obesity and its pathological consequences require accurate measurements of adipose mass, distribution and subtype. Here, we compared the validity of three abdominal obesity assessment methods (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), ultrasound and anthropometry) against the gold-standard method of computed tomography (CT) in twenty-nine non-diseased middle-aged men (BMI 26.5 (sd 3.1) kg/m(2)) and women (BMI 25.5 (sd 3.2) kg/m(2)). Assessments of adipose mass (kg) and distribution (total subcutaneous (TSAT), superficial subcutaneous (SSAT), deep subcutaneous (DSAT) and visceral (VAT)) were obtained. Spearman's correlations were performed adjusted for age and sex. VAT area that was assessed using ultrasound (r 0.79; P < 0.0001) and waist circumference (r 0.85; P < 0.0001) correlated highly with VAT from CT, as did BMI (r 0.67; P < 0.0001) and DXA (r 0.70; P < 0.0001). DXA (r 0.72; P = 0.0004), BMI (r 0.71; P = 0.0003), waist circumference (r 0.86; P < 0.0001) and ultrasound (r 0.52; P = 0.015) were less strongly correlated with CT TSAT. None of the comparison measures of DSAT was strongly correlated with CT DSAT (all r approximately 0.50; P < 0.02). BMI (r 0.76; P < 0.0001), waist circumference (r 0.65; P = 0.002) and DXA (r 0.75; P < 0.0001) were all fairly strongly correlated with the CT measure of SSAT, whereas ultrasound yielded a weaker yet statistically significant correlation (r 0.48; P = 0.03). Compared with CT, visceral and subcutaneous adiposity can be assessed with reasonable validity using waist circumference and BMI, respectively. Ultrasound or DXA does not generally provide substantially better measures of these traits. Highly valid assessments of DSAT do not appear to be possible with surrogate measures. These findings may help guide the selection of measures for epidemiological studies of obesity.

Nyckelord

Computed tomography
Ultrasound
Waist circumference
Waist:height ratio
Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Obesity
Adipose tissue
Validation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy