SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Olofsson Linus)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Olofsson Linus) > Evaluation of audit...

Evaluation of auditory, visual and olfactory event-related potentials for comparing interspersed- and single-stimulus paradigms

Nordin, Steven (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för psykologi
Andersson, Linus (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för psykologi
Olofsson, Jonas K. (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för psykologi
visa fler...
McCormack, Michael (författare)
Umeå universitet,Institutionen för psykologi
Polich, John (författare)
Molecular and Integrative Neurosciences Department, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier, 2011
2011
Engelska.
Ingår i: International Journal of Psychophysiology. - : Elsevier. - 0167-8760 .- 1872-7697. ; 81:3, s. 252-262
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • Background: An interspersed-stimulus paradigm (ISP) for event-related potential (ERP) recordings in which different sensory modality stimuli are presented within the same test session was developed to minimize recording time and facilitate modality comparison. The present study compared the ISP with a single-stimulus paradigm (SSP), using auditory, visual, and olfactory stimuli. Method: Normal participants (n=16) were assessed on two independent test occasions to obtain data on inter-paradigm and test-retest reliability. Peak amplitude/latency and area measures were obtained for the N1, P2 and P3 peaks for each paradigm. Results: Except for larger auditory and visual P3 peaks and smaller visual P2 peaks in the ISP, no significant differences in amplitudes or latencies were found between the two paradigms. Correlation coef ficients between paradigms were generally fairly high (amplitude mean r=0.76; latency r=0.42). Test–retest reliability within paradigms for amplitudes (ISP r=0.70; SSP r=0.68) and latencies (ISP r=0.44; SSP r=0.42) was similar across paradigms. Conclusion: Thefindings suggest that the ISP, compared to the SSP, produces, in general, highly comparable auditory, visual, and olfactory peak amplitudes and latencies, and comparable reliability estimates, even though the ISP takes much less time to record (25 vs. 50 min). The larger auditory and visual P3 peaks and smaller visual P2 peaks in the ISP may be attributable to a less predictable stimulus environment. Thus, this method enables systematic comparisons of ERP peaks across sensory modalities while reducing testing time. Practical implications are discussed.

Ämnesord

SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP  -- Psykologi (hsv//swe)
SOCIAL SCIENCES  -- Psychology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Event-related potential (ERP)
P3
Test-retest reliability
Single stimulis
Interspersed stimulis
Inter-modiality correlation

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy