SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

WFRF:(Leitao Jordana)
 

Sökning: WFRF:(Leitao Jordana) > Comparison of physi...

Comparison of physician-certified verbal autopsy with computer-coded verbal autopsy for cause of death assignment in hospitalized patients in low- and middle-income countries : systematic review

Leitao, Jordana (författare)
Desai, Nikita (författare)
Aleksandrowicz, Lukasz (författare)
visa fler...
Byass, Peter (författare)
Umeå universitet,Epidemiologi och global hälsa,Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University
Miasnikof, Pierre (författare)
Tollman, Stephen (författare)
Umeå universitet,Epidemiologi och global hälsa,Umeå Centre for Global Health Research, Umeå University, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa and International Network for the Demographic Evaluation of Populations and Their Health (INDEPTH) Network, Accra, Ghana
Alam, Dewan (författare)
Lu, Ying (författare)
Rathi, Suresh Kumar (författare)
Singh, Abhishek (författare)
Suraweera, Wilson (författare)
Ram, Faujdar (författare)
Jha, Prabhat (författare)
visa färre...
 (creator_code:org_t)
2014-02-04
2014
Engelska.
Ingår i: BMC Medicine. - : BioMed Central. - 1741-7015. ; 12:1, s. 22-
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • BACKGROUND: Computer-coded verbal autopsy (CCVA) methods to assign causes of death (CODs) for medically unattended deaths have been proposed as an alternative to physician-certified verbal autopsy (PCVA). We conducted a systematic review of 19 published comparison studies (from 684 evaluated), most of which used hospital-based deaths as the reference standard. We assessed the performance of PCVA and five CCVA methods: Random Forest, Tariff, InterVA, King-Lu, and Simplified Symptom Pattern.METHODS: The reviewed studies assessed methods' performance through various metrics: sensitivity, specificity, and chance-corrected concordance for coding individual deaths, and cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) error and CSMF accuracy at the population level. These results were summarized into means, medians, and ranges.RESULTS: The 19 studies ranged from 200 to 50,000 deaths per study (total over 116,000 deaths). Sensitivity of PCVA versus hospital-assigned COD varied widely by cause, but showed consistently high specificity. PCVA and CCVA methods had an overall chance-corrected concordance of about 50% or lower, across all ages and CODs. At the population level, the relative CSMF error between PCVA and hospital-based deaths indicated good performance for most CODs. Random Forest had the best CSMF accuracy performance, followed closely by PCVA and the other CCVA methods, but with lower values for InterVA-3.CONCLUSIONS: There is no single best-performing coding method for verbal autopsies across various studies and metrics. There is little current justification for CCVA to replace PCVA, particularly as physician diagnosis remains the worldwide standard for clinical diagnosis on live patients. Further assessments and large accessible datasets on which to train and test combinations of methods are required, particularly for rural deaths without medical attention.

Ämnesord

MEDICIN OCH HÄLSOVETENSKAP  -- Hälsovetenskap -- Folkhälsovetenskap, global hälsa, socialmedicin och epidemiologi (hsv//swe)
MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES  -- Health Sciences -- Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

Causes of death
Computer-coded verbal autopsy
InterVA
King and Lu
Physician-certified verbal autopsy
Random forest
Simplified symptom pattern
Tariff
Validity
Verbal autopsy

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy