SwePub
Sök i LIBRIS databas

  Utökad sökning

L773:0022 1694
 

Sökning: L773:0022 1694 > So just why would a...

So just why would a modeller choose to be incoherent?

Beven, Keith (författare)
Environmental Science/Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster UK
Smith, Paul J. (författare)
Environmental Science/Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster UK
Freer, Jim E. (författare)
Environmental Science/Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster UK
 (creator_code:org_t)
Elsevier BV, 2008
2008
Engelska.
Ingår i: Journal of Hydrology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0022-1694 .- 1879-2707. ; 354:1-4, s. 15-32
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
Abstract Ämnesord
Stäng  
  • This article provides an extended response to the criticisms of the GLUE methodology by Mantovan and Todini [Mantovan, P., Todini, E., 2006. Hydrological forecasting uncertainty assessment: incoherence of the GLUE methodology. J. Hydrol. 330, 368-381]. It is shown that the formal Bayesian identification of models is a special case of GLUE that can be used where the modeller is prepared to make very strong assumptions about the nature of the modelling errors. Under such assumptions, GLUE can be coherent in the sense of Manotvan and Todini. In real applications, however, with multiple sources of uncertainty including model structural error, their strong definition of coherence is shown to be inapplicable to the extent that the choice of a format likelihood function based on a simple error structure may be an incoherent choice. It is demonstrated by some relatively minor modifications of their hypothetical example that misspecification of the error model and the non-stationarities associated with the presence of input error and model structural error in the Bayes approach will then produce well-defined but incorrect parameter distributions. This empirical result is quite independent of GLUE, but the flexibility of the GLUE approach may then prove to be an advantage in providing more coherent and robust choices of model evaluation in these cases and, by analogy, in other non-ideal cases for real applications. At the current time it is difficult to make a reasoned choice between methods of uncertainty estimation for real applications because of a lack of understanding of the real information content of data in conditioning models.

Ämnesord

NATURVETENSKAP  -- Geovetenskap och miljövetenskap (hsv//swe)
NATURAL SCIENCES  -- Earth and Related Environmental Sciences (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

uncertainty estimation
Bayes
coherence
error models
information content of hydrological data
Earth sciences
Geovetenskap

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)
art (ämneskategori)

Hitta via bibliotek

Till lärosätets databas

Hitta mer i SwePub

Av författaren/redakt...
Beven, Keith
Smith, Paul J.
Freer, Jim E.
Om ämnet
NATURVETENSKAP
NATURVETENSKAP
och Geovetenskap och ...
Artiklar i publikationen
Journal of Hydro ...
Av lärosätet
Uppsala universitet

Sök utanför SwePub

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy